Lawisfun wrote: @Starsearcher80: You claim to have it all figure out. So answer this: Who has more Nano shares; You or me?
You imply I am a paid basher when everyone who follows knows the opposite to be true. Why you attempt to cast me as a paid basher is beyond me.
At the same time you claim to spend wakeless hours trying find holes in the Nano One investment thesis. Then someone raises some very obvious and objective concerns about Tesla being a likely and potential competitor and you tar and feather your own peer for trying to help.
So what is it? I've called you and pump and dumper who dumps on the community at each and every news release. I honestly think you have been taking advantage of this community for some time.
And you've called me a shill.
Well perhaps we are both wrong. In fact I bet we are. In fact, I think both you and I are both very long Nano One. Which we have both claimed.
I'll extend it further. I think I am much much much longer Nano One than you are (at least in terms of actual dollar value of holding. Perhaps not as a percentage of our respective portfolios). And if you are in fact longer Nano One than me, it would make me feel better knowing others in our community (especially scoundrels like yourself) likely have the same sleepless nights I have waiting to witness the Nano story unfold (and if you don't that only means you have far less riding on Nano One).
But I strongly doubt you and your pot stocks have earned you near enough money to acquire the position I currently have in Nano One. You are just a crypto/pot stock guy who got lucky and probably got lucky again when you stumbled into the Nano One investment these. You're just some guy online who dabbles in poetry about stocks.