RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:How Come!Apparent;u so, MISTERFB. There seems to be a group of posters here that have repeated that exaggeration hundreds if not close to a 1000 times since the Insiders apparently sold only a small portion of their shares. Why does it seem that they want to constantly demonize management and create an impression that most of their shares were sold???
I agree with you that if management had sold ALL of NEARLY ALL of their shares before the share price cratered, then there could be an issue. But as you correctly stated, management did not do that. This exaggeration seemingly has been repeated so much that many of those repetivite 'urban legend' posts should have been deleted for "reptition". However, if Stockhouse has AI to screen for such then does it not catch everything, unfortunately yet? Therefore posters should report these repetitive posts as a violation. It becomes tiresome for many to constantly try to prove repetition and keep reporting such posts and perhaps those that do that, hope that their repetitive posts stand and continue to be rebroadcast??? Yes, managment sold some shares at the top, but apparently it was a small portion of their holdings as i recall, as you do, MISTERFB.
g
MISTERFB wrote: Unless you have better intell than myself, the insiders that sold at the top did not unload all their shares nor the majority of their shares. They are entitled to trade what they had. Kudoes on them to make a profit on some of their investment which represents some of their salary. Do we chastise people here for trading what they have when the stock price peaks. ? If they had dumped EVERYTHING they had it might have been an issue but they didn't. Also if you want cues as to when to sell then why didn't YOU follow suit and sell as well ? And when they were buying back in Dec/Jan why didn't YOU follow suit and buy as well. Stay awake and profit.