Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Messina Minerals Inc MMIPF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals


GREY:MMIPF - Post by User

Messina Minerals Inc
Bullboard Posts
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by hisnibson Apr 03, 2005 7:54pm
327 Views
Post# 8854329

RE: zinc

RE: zincThe bottom line is, they didn't get the base metal values in the recent holes that they got in the first holes. The zinc values alone are about 10% less, the other metals (lead and copper) didn't go down as much, relatively. What this high grade gold means is anyone's guess, but look at how low the base metals were relative to the gold. Certainly not a one-to-one relationship there.
Bullboard Posts
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities