Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Alaris Royalty Corp ALARF

"Alaris Royalty Corp is engaged in investing in operating entities. Its operations consist primarily of investments in private operating entities, typically in the form of preferred limited partnership interests, preferred interest in limited liability corporations in the United States, loans receivable, or long-term license and royalty arrangements."

GREY:ALARF - Post Discussion

Alaris Royalty Corp > Analyst negativity - faulty projections
View:
Post by mickeymouse on Nov 21, 2018 2:52pm

Analyst negativity - faulty projections

Scoita currenlty has a target price of 19.00 - when you look at the numbers presented you see that they are expecting CFPS to plunge siginfiacantly next year - why is a mystery??

CFPS
2018 - 1.97
2019 - 1.64
2020 - 1.67

Also from their report their adjusted payout ratio is way out of whack:

2019 - 102.5%
2020 - 98.2%

Very negative projections and their cash deployment expectations are also very low - 2019 they are predicting a drop to well below 100 million.

This anyalyst clearly has a negative perception and either is not listening to conference calls when the positive capital deployment environment is mentioned or believes that there will be significant redemptions - in either case way out too lunch with the numbers.

With the positive resets in 6 weeks the payout ratio will drop again and new deployments will move the needle well into the 80's - amazing that a company that follows through on their promises and has dealt with problem files in an transparent and conservative manner is still treated this way by the so called experts - still trading at close to a 9% yield - but then again anything with a yield of over 5% is ridiculed and most of the analysts are on this bandwagon as they hate buy and hold dividend investors as less trading impacts their industry profits.

Would you rather have the company pay out 90% of their cash flow to you as a dividend or payout 50% with a lower dividend? - seems like a no brainer to me as I would rather have the cash in my pocket rather than leaving it with management where mistakes can be made.
Comment by loosecannon3 on Nov 21, 2018 2:56pm
Sorry care to explain what the positive resets mean?  Thanks in advance!
Comment by Capharnaum on Nov 21, 2018 5:38pm
The way the contracts are made, when metrics in the companies they invest in improve, then the distributions from those companies increase (called distribution collar). This happens yearly (can be up/down) If my memory is good, from the last CC, they said the average reset was around 4%, which means that the current distributions they receive will increase by 4% next january.
Comment by MrEvilx on Nov 21, 2018 10:22pm
Okay, let me ask you this.. why does it even matter to you ? Are you not in Alaris for dividend income ? Analyst have their own agendas, you have your own, does Alaris fit your requirement ? If yes, then ignore what others say. The company is doing all right things to make you they give you your fair share of cash. Keep collecting and ignore the noise. GLTA
Comment by Capharnaum on Nov 22, 2018 10:01am
So I ran numbers for fun. Scenario 1: In 2019, they have net $0 partner contributions during the year, Q3 partners distribution runrate for 2019 is maintained, resets are an average of 0%, GWM added. Net cash from operations would be $66.5M or $1.83 per share. Payout would be 90.2%. Scenario 2: In 2019, they have net $0 partner contributions during the year, Q3 partners distribution runrate for ...more  
Comment by SunsetGrill on Nov 22, 2018 2:14pm
All kinds of problems with your "analysis" there Goofy or i mean Mickey - Company Target institutional projections and projectionists have a variety of vested interests in many aspects outside of private investors. Its a mugs game worthy of a 60 minutes investigation. Just ask John Oconall who is on BNN as a Market call guest, Also, do some reading into how it actually works. Otherwise ...more  
Comment by gvixid on Nov 22, 2018 3:18pm
Your response was unnecessarily testy, and negative. First, not long ago the bank extended their credit line, even before they resolved some problem files. No reason they won't again considering the underlying business is now more solid Second, management said during cc that no redemptions were projected short term.
Comment by SunsetGrill on Nov 22, 2018 3:30pm
Booooo freakin Hooooo
Comment by mickeymouse on Nov 22, 2018 3:48pm
By the way Sunset - if you look up my profile you will see I have been on these boards since 1999 and have 236 people on ignore - you will make it 237 as you are a smart aleck and your posts have no value - don't bother replying.
Comment by mickeymouse on Mar 06, 2019 10:43pm
Here is another classic, useful post by Sunset Grill - the scotia analyst put out a report stating that the payout ratio for 2019 would be 102.5% and I pointed out that this was very negative and misleading - Grill boy jumped all over me and also went after Capharnaum and Gvidix. Payout ratio for 2019 is projected to be 89.1% - I guess the scotia analyst was a bit off now wasn't he Grill ...more  
Comment by mickeymouse on Nov 22, 2018 3:43pm
Thanks for the investing advice Sunset - you were quite condescending in your response and  garbage - does that sound like someone who follows investment advice blindly or needs to read up on how the game is played or go to a bank for advice - of course anlaysts promote their book and try to discredit some companies If you read the post by Capharnaum you will see his payout projections are ...more  
Comment by SunsetGrill on Nov 22, 2018 7:35pm
- if all the calc;s are correct AND THE SAME as scotia;s thn WHY do they differ - thats is mathmatically impossible and thats what i stated -show me where i show CONCERN about company exits - i stated that CFPS was  higher this yr due to company exits as you could not figure out how they drop next yr. - show me where i state the banks WONT give them more cash - i stated it may not be easy ...more  
Comment by SunsetGrill on Nov 22, 2018 8:32pm
Few more while im on a roll Run rate vs payout ratio - check it out  Show me where i show CONCERN about capital deployment. You stated that scotia has less then 100 million for next yrs deployment - WELL you even stated they only have 85 million left. Scotia cant assume they get more support. In many ways your response to mine is more pathetic than your original QUESTIONS Wont post here ...more  
Comment by Capharnaum on Nov 23, 2018 9:13am
Scotia's analysis was poor for 2018 (if you look at Scotia's forecast vs reality) and is poor again for 2019. Hopefully for Scotia's clients, the analyst does a better job for the other stocks he's analyzing, but I wouldn't hold my breath.
Comment by checkup on Nov 27, 2018 4:47pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by SunsetGrill on Mar 06, 2019 6:03pm
Comment by SunsetGrill on Mar 06, 2019 10:55pm
Comment by TickerTwit on Nov 22, 2018 7:01pm
I would imagine it's a matter of cash flow. The banks should be happy enough to open the spigot if debt payments are well-covered.
Comment by mickeymouse on Mar 07, 2019 10:08pm
Well here was my original post and your very mature, intelligent reponse.  The scotia analyst got it completely wrong on the payout ratio and cash flow per share projection for 2019.  You chimed in with your expertise on how much capital they had left to deploy " less than $100 million" - wrong!! First response to another persons post and you start off with name calling and ...more  
Comment by SunsetGrill on Mar 08, 2019 10:59am
No he didnt; bang on. And is correct again in his latest analysis - covenent at 2.3x Thanks for bringing up I called you Goofy- that was a good one. Ya know as a referece to your board name - GET IT. Sometimes i even crack myself up.  Will provide website later of ball surgury going on in Los Angeles.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities