Some name dropping and questons I agree with MacBook!
But the "award decision" of the ICSID is so extreme weird, that I like to know more details about is. So here are some names of persons involved. At least EOM (our money) payment and compensations questions to Freshfields might also occure, if the Colombian "framing attempt" is right about "missing evidences".
---------------
Claimant appointee:
Horacio A. Grigera Nan
Respondent appointee:
Philippe Sands
Chair/President:
Juliet Blanch
Claimant's counsel:
Nigel Blackaby, Caroline Richard, Juan Pedro Poms, Elliot Luke, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
Respondent's counsel:
Fernando Mantilla-Serrano, r. John Adam, Aija Lejniece, Diego Romero, Latham & Watkins, Luis Guillermo Vlez Cabrera, Sylvia Helena Garca, Maria Camila Rincn Escobar, Office of Attorney General of Colombia
----------
Markings added by me: yellow = our people //green = the decision making 3. part and councel from the ICSID.
source:
https://www.italaw.com/cases/6320 -------------
There is also a greyed out PDF link on that source page, which seems to contain the original award text. I do not have login access to this page. If some one has it, please let us know the original award text.
---------
My first comment without knowing the important award text: I can not imagine that Freshfield was not able to deliver formal legal correct evidences about our costs and damages (like the Colombian source stated it) ! These costs are too obvious and only needed just to put into a legal correct form.
What went wrong here ???!!! Which person is the official representative of Canada in in the World Bank, whom we can contact ?
Why do neither Eco Oro nor the ICSID present the orignal award text to the public, the EOM shareholders and the CVR owners ?!