Comment by
kidl2 on Dec 13, 2015 10:49am
Zen: Is this what you were alluding to? If not, it's time to spill your beans. :-) koast: Great find and thanks for sharing.
Comment by
shawshank on Dec 13, 2015 7:36pm
Come Come now kid..you and ZENC been backroom-backwater-Rowlands private dialogue amigos for quite some time...or do you forget so soon the error of your ways behind the thread? FWIW?...I DON"T. SS
Comment by
kidl2 on Dec 13, 2015 11:09am
I love the “packaging” and timing couldn’t be better in light of the Paris hoopla. Long live Climate Change ... :-) BTW, anyone still have any doubts about the closing of the SICPA transaction?
Comment by
RomanGod on Dec 13, 2015 2:05pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
lscfa on Dec 13, 2015 12:11pm
That article looks very old......©OECD Observer No 304, November 2011
Comment by
Hereforthemoney on Dec 13, 2015 12:58pm
Thats not what I see on my screen. Rub your eyes a couple times and see if that helps. Why would SICPA be talking about fuel marking in 2011?? ©L'Observateur de l'OCDE n°304 novembre 2015
Comment by
RomanGod on Dec 13, 2015 2:01pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
kidl2 on Dec 13, 2015 2:10pm
Here is the link which goes with the 2015 date: [url=https://www.observateurocde.org/news/fullstory.php/aid/3970/SICPA_:_La_fraude_au_carburant_aggrave_les__E9missions_automobiles_nocives_et_augmente_la_consommation_de_carburant_.html][/url]
Comment by
shawshank on Dec 13, 2015 8:06pm
LSCFA-agreed....looks like a couple poster clowns have egg on their face once again...OR...is what their quoting not publicly available yet/again just like in their not to distant past? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnnn?? SS