Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Great Bear Resources Ltd. GTBAF

Great Bear Resources Ltd. is a Vancouver-based gold exploration company focused on advancing its 100% owned Dixie project in Northwestern Ontario, Canada. A significant exploration drill program is currently underway to define the mineralization within a large-scale, high-grade disseminated gold discovery made in 2019, the LP Fault. Additional exploration drilling is also in progress to... see more

OTCQX:GTBAF - Post Discussion

Great Bear Resources Ltd. > Why can't inferred resources be calculated instantaineously?
View:
Post by Tminus1blkswan on Oct 24, 2019 10:40pm

Why can't inferred resources be calculated instantaineously?

I'm an engineer but not of the geo-tech kind.  Can anyone explain to me what prevents an inferred resources calculation to be run as drilling results come back from the lab?  With all the computing power we have these days, I would have thought this could happen almost instantaneously.

Thanks.
Comment by Goaweigh on Oct 25, 2019 12:03am
Nothing, but at this point we don't have enough data yet and even if we did Chris is avoiding putting out a resourse estimate so as to avoid creating the impression that the deposit will be only so big ! As he's said numerous times, you can't define a resourse until you've found the edges first and we haven't even come close to finding the edges yet. You better believe that ...more  
Comment by aranicer on Oct 25, 2019 3:21am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by SuneeDaze on Oct 25, 2019 6:51am
They could, as long as they don’t release results to public.  Any resource calculation (formal) needs to be NI-43-101 compliant.
Comment by fredo1 on Oct 25, 2019 3:12pm
Inferred resource must be estimated based on 50 meter center or less drill holes. So, how many holes does GBR have to drill to fully delineate an inferred resource?  200? 400? more? Depends on the areal extent of the deposit right? Also depends on the continuity of the minerization right? Not so simple.
Comment by Chad005 on Oct 25, 2019 6:22pm
That’s why I got excited about the last drill results. I think most people freaked out when McEwen Mining sold off 1 million shares and the share price pulled back.  The last drill results were showing continuity of mineralization.  The strike length of the LP fault is HUGE...  We aren’t close to inferred resource estimates yet, but break out a calculator and try even low ball ...more  
Comment by Tminus1blkswan on Oct 25, 2019 7:16pm
I'm assuming 50m is the max 43-101 allowed spacing, but nearly an adjustable parameter in the resource modeling software. Anyone know where I can get bootleg modeling software or spreadsheet?
Comment by SuneeDaze on Oct 26, 2019 12:50pm
T, You’d need to know the density of the ore/mineralized zones to calculate any resource.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities