Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Great Bear Resources Ltd. GTBAF

Great Bear Resources Ltd. is a Vancouver-based gold exploration company focused on advancing its 100% owned Dixie project in Northwestern Ontario, Canada. A significant exploration drill program is currently underway to define the mineralization within a large-scale, high-grade disseminated gold discovery made in 2019, the LP Fault. Additional exploration drilling is also in progress to... see more

OTCQX:GTBAF - Post Discussion

Great Bear Resources Ltd. > 25 million ounces?
View:
Post by captainpooby1 on Jan 06, 2020 12:25pm

25 million ounces?

If you take Chris Taylor's comment from the AGM: 

"he believes GBR to be a strike with a 50-60 mine life and he aims to prove it"

and couple it with his statement in the just released letter: 

"One of our goals with the Dixie project is to define what the industry refers to as a “Tier 1” asset.  This is usually defined as a deposit that can produce over 500,000 ounces of gold per year, for at least 10 years."

What do you get? 50 years x 500k oz/year = 25M oz.

Amirite?
Comment by Goaweigh on Jan 06, 2020 12:31pm
Yourrightaboutthe25millionoz ! But I supect they would ramp up production to 1,000,000 oz. per year give or take. There could be multiple deposits like Hemlo each producing 500,000 oz. !
Comment by flashcash on Jan 06, 2020 12:55pm
Best way I suppose would be multiple declines along the high grade zones and then followed up later by bulk mining the lower grade, certainly enough area to have many, many declines. GLA Dont, sell, accumulate !
Comment by Tminus1blkswan on Jan 06, 2020 9:55pm
Myself, I'm unsure what the best way to mine this would be. Maybe go after a cutoff over 0.5g/t and blend with high grade to get you an overall 1g/t to the mill. Someone smarter than me will figure it out though.
Comment by flashcash on Jan 07, 2020 1:34am
That low grade would most likely be better off with heap leaching.
Comment by Goaweigh on Jan 07, 2020 10:33am
I was wondering about that very same thing but it occured to me that tempature might play a part in that. If it's too cold then the solutions used to leach out the gold may not flow properly and so production may be limited and in the case of Red Lake it's well below freezing for at least 4 months of the year.  So I checked out how Malartic processed it's ore and here it is ...more  
Comment by Goaweigh on Jan 07, 2020 11:03am
Taking this a bit further I believe Malartic had a higher grade component, a sweet spot that was mined out years ago and they then discovered or realized, maybe as economics changed, that they had a bulk tonnage situation but most of it was under the town. So they moved the town and are now mining that bulk tonnage part of the deposit. Now as I mentioned the grade they report is 1.10 grams so can ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities