Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Longview Oil Corp LGVWF

GREY:LGVWF - Post Discussion

Longview Oil Corp > from RBC Capital Markets
View:
Post by blondeBond on Dec 13, 2013 9:14am

from RBC Capital Markets

2014 Guidance; Dividend Reduced
Our view: While the dividend cut signals a step in the right direction, we
do not believe the cut is large enough to significantly change investment
levels or growth outlook, in our view. We have modestly increased 2014
production estimates but remain slightly below guidance on a slightly
higher capital budget than planned.
Management has highlighted a lasting commitment to the high yield, low growth
business model. The dividend was cut from $0.05/share per month to
$0.04/share per month. We believe that at a post-cut yield of 9.5%,
the company remains susceptible to the same issues it has faced in the
past; keeping a balanced payout ratio while battling corporate production
declines. Our slightly more conservative estimates result in an effective
payout ratio of 115% and draws on the company's bank facility.
 
Maintaining Sector Perform Rating. We maintain a Sector Perform
recommendation and a $6.00 price target based on a 0.6x multiple of Base
NAV, which is below the oil weighted peer group average of 1.4x.
 
Comment by Nawaralsaadi on Dec 13, 2013 9:59am
It makes no sense to me why RBC would apply a 0.6 NAV multiple to LNV against a 1.4 multiple for the sector. They issues they mention of balancing growth and payout are a stable of all oil/gas divided payers, most of LNV peers balance their payout by printing shares (DRIP program), thus I am not sure why they deserve 2.3 times LNV’s multiple. I would grant them that past execution at LNV has not ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities