Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Mart Resources Inc MAUXF

OTCPK:MAUXF - Post Discussion

View:
Post by grandpama4 on Oct 24, 2012 7:27pm

Merger

After a merger Mart would be controlled by Midwestern who would have control of electing the board and therefore control management , dividend policy, future drilling budgets etc. Could result in major changes. It is my understanding that the company being allocated fields must be controled by an indigenous company such as Midwestern. Please clarify how merger could be accomplished without losing control to Midwestern.
Comment by Bart2 on Oct 24, 2012 8:34pm
I concur with Grandpama4. Would like to hear how a merger would help us. Mart is doing very well now as it stands and dont see how a merger would be of benefit.Would like to hear other opinions tho.
Comment by hangemhigh4 on Oct 24, 2012 9:00pm
This question I asked Bobby. He says it will benefit Mart to merge. Ask him for more info as he seems to be more knowledged on this. imo
Comment by themangokid on Oct 24, 2012 9:08pm
I dont know how likely a merger is.  Although that would be an interesting discussion in and of itself.  However, regarding a theoretical merger.  I think a merger would jump the share price as we would actually own the land and no longer just be the drilling operators.  As remote or as not remote as the possibility is, isn't part of the "risk" in mart the fact ...more  
Comment by grandpama4 on Oct 24, 2012 9:33pm
I don't know even with a merger if you own the land. I thought  Midwestern had the licence to explore and develop the field but do not own the land. They possibly lease the land but I think the land is owned by Nigeria so the risks remain if Nigeria wanted to nationalize all oil lands and the operating fields( not likely as has never been done in Nigeria). Again I think Western has ...more  
Comment by mjh9413 on Oct 24, 2012 11:38pm
Where did this idea of a merger originate? The Marginal Field Program started as a carve-out of multinational oil companies holdings to indigineous Nigerian companies so that they could gain employment for  Nigerians and get capital and technology and know-how from foreign oil companies and, at the same time, increase output from the marginal fields in line with the government's overall ...more  
Comment by Greenchips on Oct 25, 2012 8:46am
Companies never own the land or sub surface rights. OML stands for Oil Mining License, PSC stands for Production Sharing Contract, pretty much self explanatory. Indigenous companies (like OER) receive preferential treatment in terms of accessing marginal fields and also enjoy lower tax rates in some circumstances.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities