Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Mart Resources Inc MAUXF

OTCPK:MAUXF - Post Discussion

View:
Post by zeus55 on Aug 13, 2013 12:04am

sganza

Just a few notes.

The acquisition of the second rig does not show faith by the bank. That was shown when the bank gave the loan the ok, and allowed Mart to continue to pay the dividend. And I noted that when it happened.

I agree that the increased delivery capacity on the AGIP pipeline is great news, and will undoubtedly strengthen Mart's financial position. But we don't know when that is going to happen. We have no idea whatsoever. maybe someone does, but they aren't sharing that info here.
If we get the extra production soon, it will make a big difference.
But if we don't get it until the Umugini pipeline is done, or almost done, it will make little difference.

As for losing capital because I sold, you lost me there, as I sold my core position in the $2.12 range. The shares I bought just before the dividend announcement were sold for a slight gain. And the share price has fallen since, so I could buy back cheaper if I wanted to.

Some think a 'paper loss' isn't a real loss. Tell that to those who bought all of their shares over $2.
Comment by sgandza on Aug 13, 2013 10:45am
The reason I noted the second rig and the bank was because there was discussion on this board about the bank calling in the credit facility early. Plus you mentioned that the risk profile was too high now that the pipeline is delayed. If the bank thought the "risk" of this company was too great, they probably would call the loan. Banks don't just give out 100 mil and not pay ...more  
Comment by zeus55 on Aug 13, 2013 6:48pm
"The reason I noted the second rig and the bank was because there was discussion on this board about the bank calling in the credit facility early" ------------------------------------- Fair enough "I think Midwestern wouldn't agree to all of the capital outlays if there wasn't a way to increase production soon. Plus, if the new capacity wasn't being ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities