Comment by
tony1969 on Jun 15, 2012 4:33pm
That is the whole idea Top. Build it (Tgz/Ole) then have a major buy them later. Hey Gf, estimates a little high but I will take them.>
Comment by
topoftheridge on Jun 15, 2012 6:41pm
TGZ down 7% today, new 52 week low, on large volume, almost all of the volume in the last 30 minutes.
Comment by
Roro1 on Jun 15, 2012 8:16pm
No way Santa Rosa was sold for $5K. There has to be more to it than that. The legal fees alone to close such a transaction would exceed $5K. Then the buyer turned around and sold it for $1 million? Who is absolutely sure about this?
Comment by
caliche on Jun 16, 2012 3:27am
i guarantee you the sale was done at 5K.. the re sale is just what i have seen here.. as for chets options you can bet if the deal is done at a dollar they will issue themselves 10 million new options at .50.. i would think a re pricing of options is a clear signal the deal is close and at a terrible price..to us .. caliche
Comment by
caliche on Jun 16, 2012 6:56am
most likley a capital raise..the shares were up in australia by 13 cents.. then to have them fall here.. wierd..they tracked pretty even till yesterday .. then a big divergence..short the aussie shares or buy in NA? caliche
Comment by
caliche on Jun 16, 2012 6:57am
most likley a capital raise..the shares were up in australia by 13 cents.. then to have them fall here.. wierd..they tracked pretty even till yesterday .. then a big divergence..short the aussie shares or buy in NA? caliche
Comment by
caliche on Jun 16, 2012 6:59am
with the fx the aussie tgz is 2.05 cdn
Comment by
Roro1 on Jun 17, 2012 11:13pm
Goldn1, I appreciate your inpt, and maybe you are correct. However, I still have to beleive there is more to it. Chet would expose himself and OLE to major litigation without some logcal explanation, It just doesn't work like that. IMHO.
Comment by
goldn1 on Jun 18, 2012 12:08am
I am not sure how much clearer it can get. Shareholders got screw*d, again!!!
Comment by
goldn1 on Jun 18, 2012 12:11am
https://www.oromin.com/i/pdf/2012-05-28_AIF.pdf ---(Page 14) https://www.oromin.com/i/pdf/OLEFS111130-Q3.PDF --- (Page 19) G1
Comment by
RottenEggS on Jun 18, 2012 9:38am
Although the transaction on the surface looks like a stinker, it would seem to me that they are trying to clean up the company for a sale, JMHO
Comment by
goldn1 on Jun 18, 2012 11:14am
Rotten: Setting yourself up for a sale could have meant moving the asset into another entity, not giving it away for someone else to flip for a quick million. Also, they sold it back in December. Who would sell something they already lost $1.5 million in if they could hold it for 5 years and not invest another penny? G1
Comment by
Roro1 on Jun 18, 2012 2:02pm
Thanks goln1. Would be really nice to hear what managment has to say abot it.