Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Second Wave Petroleum Inc SCSZF

GREY:SCSZF - Post Discussion

View:
Post by iaminvestor on Nov 30, 2012 12:50pm

2P RESERVES

The  tax  loss   selling  period   makes  people   ignore  the  fundamentals   once  again......and  SCS  gives  them  a  good  chance   to   reduce  their  capital  gains  of  2012.

 

However   the 2P  Reserves of  SCS  are:

 

SCS   had   11 MBoe   (85%    OIL)   in  DEC  2011   WITHOUT   adding   any  reserves   from  its   big  drilling  success  in  H1   2012  when  it  hit  wells  with  IP   4000   and   5000  boepd  as  it  sits  on  the  SWEET   SPOT  of  beaverhill   lake.  SCS    had   4   wells  in  the  TOP-16    wells    of  Canada   as the  latest   article   in  Seeking Alpha     clearly  notes.

 
 
The  new  Reserves  report  will  be  released  in  early  2013.  I   believe  SCS  2P  Reserves  will  be  close  to  20 MMboe   (80%   OIL)   after  the  success   of  H1   2012.
 
 
Even  if  we  assume  15 MMboe  (85%    OIL)    which is  very   meagre    30%   increase,   SCS  should  have  an  300 M    enterprise  value   currently.   It  has  only   $130M !

Comment by Iamwcw on Nov 30, 2012 1:01pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by Iamwcw on Nov 30, 2012 1:45pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by nlr2 on Nov 30, 2012 2:38pm
I'm not a politician but perhaps I should take your advice, I'm sure I can count on your vote. Haha. If your not writing articles and posts all over the place you should probably tell the authors to quit copying you. Just a heads up. Now to your points. - IP's are meaningless. They are fluff. Eye popping IP's over a 10 day period mean nothing. Look at the type curve from Q3. You ...more  
Comment by puntabeach on Nov 30, 2012 3:12pm
U are definitely a politician who is also IN DENIAL as you keep misleading ! 1) Even with Reliable, you MISLEAD and you ignore the BASICS as CPG paid 100K although it was a MINOR producer of 1,000 boepd. Read carefully :"The company is acquiring Reliable Energy for shares (0.00794 of a Crescent Point share for each Reliable share) in a deal valued at $103.9 million (CPG already owned ...more  
Comment by nlr2 on Nov 30, 2012 4:19pm
Wait a sec. Who am I arguing with Iaminvestor or Puntabeach? Haha. Very confusing. Pick the wrong account? Anyways welcome puntabeach.  How about Cutpick then?After adjusting for the value of land and seismic, the acquisition metric equates to $73,036 per producing BOE/d. I looked at the figures for the Reliable takeover backing out the debt of reliable which CPG assumed. Hence the lower ...more  
Comment by iaminvestor on Nov 30, 2012 5:17pm
Pathetic    misleading  feedback.  I  posted  FACTS,  you  posted   your  theories. and  after  your  complete  failure  with  Reliable, now  you   bring  the  PRIVATELY  HELD   Cutpick  on  the  table  with a  65%   oil  and  liquids   and ...more  
Comment by nlr2 on Nov 30, 2012 5:57pm
Punta is your sons account? Thats fun, little family stockhousing. After supper get out your Rosetta Stone CD's and work on your english. Haha. Your facts out of context make no sense. You cherry pick what you feel strengthens your case and ignore what doesn't. I guess thats an opinion. You disregard the declines, the debt, the failure of management, the lack of operatorship, the lack of a ...more  
Comment by iaminvestor on Nov 30, 2012 6:13pm
Your  post  goes  directly  to  my  trash bin. and  This  is  NOT  my  article....I told you I do not write any articles  ANYWHERE   but it is clear you can not get even the SIMPLEST  sentences  let  alone  the  ones  with  drilling  results  and  numbers.     EOM   ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities