Sir Royalty Income Fund SIRZF

Board to increase to 9

[BlueJay2020]

...to ensure Lembit does not gain control. It is fascinating to see this game play out. There is clearly no love lost between Fowler and Janes. One imagines, though, thst yesterday's announcements were made with the AGM in mind.

I actually think this could be a sensible move to broker some peace, but it does seem overkill to have such a large number (all being paid fees).

I need to see the particulars of the proposed new faces before they get my vote.

[Robsopinion]

That release smells very strongly of fear.  and they recommend against voting for Janes nominees.  this will be the most interesting AGM of the year!   

[flamingogold]

I'll take my chances with Lembitt. We should never forget that without his advocacy we would have been taken under for almost half of what we are trading for now.

[flamingogold]

correction... less than half!

[Robsopinion]

Why would you think that? I wouldn't have tendered my units, would you have? 

[flamingogold]

Rob, I'm not sure if you are asking me or not, but I did not tender a single share. I was buying.

[Robsopinion]

No, I was responding to the post that basically said we would have been bought out by Fowler's offer. If he didn't have enough people tender the buyout would not have happened. I don't think that many of us would have tendered at that price.