Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Athabasca Oil Corp T.ATH

Alternate Symbol(s):  ATHOF

Athabasca Oil Corporation (AOC) is a Canadian energy company with a focused strategy on the development of thermal and light oil assets. AOC’s segments include Light Oil and Thermal Oil. The Thermal Oil segment includes the Company’s assets, liabilities and operating results for the exploration, development and production of bitumen from sand and carbonate rock formations located in the... see more

TSX:ATH - Post Discussion

Athabasca Oil Corp > Alberta Wins “Turn Off Oil Taps” Court Battle
View:
Post by kijiji on Apr 29, 2021 9:20am

Alberta Wins “Turn Off Oil Taps” Court Battle

Canada’s oil-producing province of Alberta scored a win in court this week after the Federal Court of Appeal said that the province had the right to enact its “turn-off-the-taps” legislation and to control the volume and the destination of oil flowing through its pipelines to other provinces.
 
During the height of the dispute between Alberta and neighboring British Columbia over the Trans Mountain Expansion project to twin the existing pipeline and expand the terminal in Burnaby, B.C., Alberta’s government approved in early 2018 the so-called Bill 12, which would give it the powers to reduce the flow of crude oil to British Columbia in retaliation for B.C.’s relentless efforts to put a permanent end to the expansion of the Trans Mountain pipeline.
 
Immediately after Alberta adopted the legislation, British Columbia’s Premier John Horgan threatened to take Alberta to court to prevent the neighboring province from enacting the legislation.
 
“If the Alberta government chooses to proclaim their legislation, we will move quickly to strike it down,” Horgan said at the time.
 
The court battle that ensued resulted in 2019 in a court granting British Columbia a temporary injunction against the bill on the grounds that the “turn-off-the-taps” legislation, if acted upon, would cause harm to its residents. Alberta’s argument in the case was that this harm was speculative.
 
The Federal Court of Appeal, however, ruled on Tuesday that the injunction granted to British Columbia by the lower court should be overturned. The province of British Columbia was also ordered to pay the costs of the litigation, the three justices said.
 
“We are pleased with yesterday’s decision by the Federal Court of Appeal. We remain committed to standing up for Alberta, including protecting the value of our natural resources,” Alberta Energy Minister Sonya Savage said in a statement on Wednesday carried by The Canadian Press.
Comment by Chris007 on Apr 29, 2021 10:46am
LOL...kind of funny that the oilprice.com article cites an article from the Calgary Herald, but somehow manys to skip over the most important point, as to why the injunction was thrown out... The court says without regulations and a licensing scheme from Alberta, the court should not assess the constitutional validity of the law on the basis that it allows discrimination in the supply of fuels ...more  
Comment by Backinblack1000 on Apr 29, 2021 1:06pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by Chris007 on Apr 29, 2021 1:17pm
Its a pretty logical ruling, makes sense that the court isn't going to weigh in on something that hasn't actually happened...
Comment by Maxmoe on Apr 29, 2021 3:28pm
Looks more to me like typical government pass the buck, hide under the bed strategy to anything remotely controversial. Quebec has put up a blockade of oil crossing the province to New Brunswick and nothing happened. It's completely illogical and chicken sheet to not rule because there hasn't been an incident yet. Using Sheldon cooper's reductio ad absurdum argument, that would be like ...more  
Comment by cahclick on Apr 29, 2021 6:15pm
Yup, can you say Spineless 
Comment by Chris007 on Apr 29, 2021 7:52pm
Well that’s the problem with political posturing. Turning off the taps sounds all well and good, but as the courts rightly asks, what the hell does it actually mean? It’s not like even Alberta had any concrete measures in mind… If they actually came out with a detailed plan explaining what "turning off the taps" meant, and by what means they would do it, it gives the courts aleast ...more  
Comment by khyber2 on Apr 29, 2021 8:02pm
Let's ask nuttle tomorrow on market call, if he still has all his Ath shares. Interesting article in the Vancouver sun today, especially CEOs buying back their shares, when all hell broke loose, and oil went negative. That's putting your money where your mouth is.Still hoping and praying for ATH to hit at least $1.50 a share by the end of the summer. I can dream, can't I? Khyber
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities