Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Dream Office Real Estate Investment Trust T.D.UN

Alternate Symbol(s):  DRETF

Dream Office Real Estate Investment Trust (the Trust) is an open-ended real estate investment trust. The Trust owns central business district office properties in various urban centers across Canada, with a focus on downtown Toronto. The Trust owns and manages 3.5 million square feet of office land in downtown Toronto. Its objectives include managing its business and assets to provide both... see more

TSX:D.UN - Post Discussion

View:
Post by SNAKEYBOY on Jul 08, 2023 4:01pm

Fact or Fiction

37.5m shares x$13 = $487m
37.5m shares x $35 = $1,312m

=$825 million in equity discount.

Artis about 1 billion, HR about 2 billion.

You think the "Fed"/SEC that ensures normal functioning of markets would either tighten up on the NAV reits  report or look into  thesebillions of discounts in publically traded reits.   Some of these big pension funds  should just buy them out full and steal them.  Why does Group Mache and private investors just buy properties for NAV when they could buy out full reits
Comment by Reece1986b on Jul 08, 2023 7:45pm
There have been very few office property transactions in the past year. There have been even fewer office property transactions since U.S. regional banks started having problems. Many public market office REITs are down 20-40% this year. That would suggest that market participants do not believe office properties are worth the same amount today that they were worth at the start of this year ...more  
Comment by SNAKEYBOY on Jul 08, 2023 9:45pm
Its crazy how REITS report NAV as a version of their success, like its supposed to impress shareholders.  Riocan doesn't highlight NAV like HR, D, Artis do....it goes by FFO growth per year. Thats a good metric while Manji etc are trying to spin their version of sucess with the fairy dust NAV number that make the share price look like its a fire sae
Comment by hroark7 on Jul 09, 2023 11:39am
Basically when REITs talk about NAV, they're saying "We're cheap!" What RioCan is saying is, "We're growing!" Cheap can get cheaper.
Comment by Frankie10 on Jul 09, 2023 9:30pm
Great point. Both can be true.
Comment by BlueJay2020 on Jul 10, 2023 9:29am
The more I think about it, the more I think the market cap is a much better guide to asset values than NAV. It's what someone is prepared to pay at any point in real time. There are occasionally short-term market dislocations like Covid but the current SP is due to interest rates rocketing (in relative terms) on top of doubt about the viability of office space.  I am amazed we haven't ...more  
Comment by Frankie10 on Jul 10, 2023 9:50am
Lots of words to say how much more meaningful the implied cap rate is vs the weight average cap rate used to determine IFRS values (NAV). ...this is the true value of NAV and IFRS cap rates, imho. Determining implied cap rates based on NAV  is literally connecting the dots and analyzing the real time price on a look-through basis of the underlying assets themselves. ...don't be too ...more  
Comment by mnztr on Jul 10, 2023 5:52pm
These assets needs to compete with risk free rate of return which is now in the 5% range. A far cry from the 1.25% 2 years ago. So thus the stock has to drop to 13 to provide a premium over bonds. Even then that premium is only 2.5% or so
Comment by SNAKEYBOY on Jul 10, 2023 6:21pm
True but 5 and 10 year are better guages as real estate investors aren't looking at a 1 year return,  but decades
Comment by mnztr on Jul 10, 2023 11:18pm
True, thats what I was looking for,  but its been up, then down, then up and now down again. if i hadn't sold I would be under water in capital  over about 12 or 13 years. 
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities