Post by
mercedesman on Sep 13, 2021 11:23am
The Pathway to $ 9 !? - Corrected
Apologies (one key point corrected, clarificaitons & spelling). No change to targets.
Using new Sept Presentation facts and figures....
Anticipated Tigris Interim Enrollment - re-iterated (in the presentation) as Q4 2021 !
Note: this is associated with the next Baxter milestone Payment (another cash infusion by the multi-billion $ Distribution partner)
Targeteded Market penetration thru partnership with Baxter (35-45%) (per presentation)
Let's use 40% (the midpoint)
EBITDA (EAA & PMX based on $ 7500/column market price - per presentation)
$197.50M USD (midpoint of 35% $ 173M and 45% $ 222M USD - EBITDA's are per presentation)
(Note: EBITDA's seem to use a 120k potential patient target, yet an updated "competitor" comparison seems to suggest 150k potential patient market. perhaps allowing for growth in Sepsis and Covid affect on # Sepsis cases?) Needless to say, if factored into EBITDA calcs, this could represent another 25% upside to the share price (PMX portion only)?
fully diluted pro-forma # shares 275M (per presentation)
EBITDA multiple (say 10X - highly conservative for an FDA approved medical device co., with limited competition in a given space, and high barriers to entry)
Estimated MC based on EBITDA multiple = $ 197M USD X 10 = $ 1,975M
Per share valuation estimate:
$ 7.18 USD (= $1,975M / 275M shares)
or approx.
$ 9 CAD (using todays FX rates). PMX & EAA (NA) only. note: EAA is really worldwide and can/should be used ww (incl. in USA) to triage patients with Sepsis symptooms, to eliminate possibiltiy of endotoxemia (not factored into the presentation, that I can see) Zero valuation for Dialco.
Note...(1) no discount factor used, (2) if you thought PMX had a 3.6% chance of success in the "confirmatory" Phase 3B Trial, you might value it at say $ 0.33 today (3.6% x $ 9). i.e. this assumes a 96.4% likellihood of a future valuation of $ 0, and a 3.6% likelihood of $ 9 valuation. (of course this also assumes an efficieint market and promotion - neither of which seems to be very evident)
Personally, I prefer to use a 50-60% likelihood of success, given societal need for a new Sepsis solution, stated early results, Meta-analyses of various PMX studies/Trials over 2 decades, non culturable bacteria subgroup, other new RWE, likely CV-19 impact on go forward Sepsis stats, nature of the Trial (Bayesian, Open Label, 2:1), Kellum's commitment to the co., etc.
Please critique my math at your leisure.
MM
Comment by
BayStreetWild on Sep 14, 2021 9:43pm
Hey did you get your pretend 34 cent bid filled? seemed like more than enough to go around today. See if you can pretend to put more at a lower price. Maybe that will fill too while you STT and AP pretend you're different people circle jaying it. Must feel weird complimenting yourself from different aliases pretending you're buying the stock and throwing out made up price targets.
Comment by
BayStreetWild on Sep 14, 2021 11:50pm
I like your fantasy stories. Let's hear some more. I find it hard to believe those are misprints it's more likely that they are promises that are yet to be broken. Par for the course. As we come closer to the date... they'll move the goalposts. Over and over and over.