Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Supreme Cannabis Company Inc. (The) T.FIRE

The Supreme Cannabis Co Inc is a Canada-based company engaged in the production and sale of medical and recreational cannabis. Its portfolio includes products that address recreational, medical, and wellness consumers. Its brands include BlissCo, Truverra, 7ACRES, Sugarleaf, and Hiway.

TSX:FIRE - Post Discussion

Supreme Cannabis Company Inc. (The) > Look at the post history of these pumpers
View:
Post by Supremedud2 on Jan 08, 2020 6:33pm

Look at the post history of these pumpers

I remember back in 2016 opt was constantly saying this would go to $5 and beyond. These people can't be real. Accusing others of being short, weak hands letting go of their shares, shorts are covering etc. No mention of how they voted to receive shares at the last AGM. No need for management to buy shares anymore when they voted to give themselves shares. Last year they voted for the rs and these guys said it was to go to the NYSE lol. Nobody here even read the truverra acquisition documents on sedar where it mentioned truverra holders will receive a unspecified dividend. Guess who were part of truverra lol. What about Bayfield? $2 million for what? The last news release showed how their pr is. My opinion, NAV left because theres no way they will hit guidance and when they don't they can say well that was the previous managements say so.
Comment by brentkosta on Jan 08, 2020 6:49pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by Supremedud2 on Jan 08, 2020 6:53pm
don't forget that they raised over $200 million through dilution for a facility that's taken how many years now to complete just for 50,000kg lol. They have 1/3 of ACB shares with 10% of their revenue.
Comment by Qczar417 on Jan 08, 2020 7:19pm
Do you actually know how Supreme grows their product,  I don't think you do. why do you say you remember back in 2016?  Your identity as the Superdud is  2 days old,  or is this one of the new superdud identities that emerge to wax negativity?   Here's a question you can't / won't answer,  Why are you here? you sound a lot like the realisticTool,   ...more  
Comment by Supremedud2 on Jan 08, 2020 7:46pm
I like how you lose more questions to a random person on sh than a company that you dumped your money in which is tanking. I've been following all the weed stocks since 2015 and have been all over the boards. You've been here for how long? See you in the 30s lol
Comment by brentkosta on Jan 08, 2020 9:34pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by Qczar417 on Jan 08, 2020 10:23pm
Sorry ,  not sure what the name calling is?   Does superdud count as name calling,   If it does then I apologize,  don't want any hurt feelings here,     
Comment by brentkosta on Jan 09, 2020 12:23am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by Supremedud2 on Jan 09, 2020 12:26am
not unless John and Nav have interest in truverra and blisscoband somehow, the publically traded company that has cash through financing buys those companies out. Bad management or genius way of getting a payday?
Comment by brentkosta on Jan 09, 2020 12:50am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by Supremedud2 on Jan 09, 2020 1:02am
well blissco was easy to see as you could find their holdings on sedi but truverra was a little trickier as one would have to read the whole acquisition documents which was pages upon pages. Let's be real, very few people here even read financials. All they see is the revenue line. Look how many times people here have mentioned that they have lots of cash but don't mention that the 100 ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities