Nano One Materials Corp T.NANO

Alternate Symbol(s): NNOMF

Technology Electronic Components

Nano One Materials Corp. is a clean technology company with a patented, scalable and low-carbon intensity industrial process for the low-cost production of high-performance lithium-ion battery cathode materials. It specializes in the production of low-cost, high-performance cathode active materials for lithium-ion batteries. Its technology is applicable to electric vehicles, energy storage, and consumer electronics, reducing costs and carbon intensity while improving environmental impact. Its patented One-Pot process is engineered to make cathode materials directly from non-sulfate forms of battery metals. Its Metal to Cathode Active Material (M2CAM) Technology enables sulfate-free metal powder inputs which eliminates 100% of wasteful sodium sulfate by-products while simplifying manufacturing. The One-Pot process simplifies production and enables its M2CAM technology. Its simplified One-Pot process enables cathodes to form simultaneously with their protective coating at the nano level.

TSX:NANO - Post by User

Nano One Materials Corp

<< Previous

Bullboard Posts

Next >>

(172)
•••

Comment by Lawisfunon Mar 14, 2025 1:14pm

153 Views

Post# 36493836

RE:RE:RE:I JUST SENT THIS MESSAGE TO NANO MANAGEMENT

The NDA topic is so perplexing. What possible reason might their be to warrant an NDA? Why would anyone want to keep their working relationship with Nano One secret?

And at the same time,

GM has openly invested in MitraChem and works openly with LG on cathode and cells.

Ford is openly working with Eco Pro BM and SK On on cathode and cells.

Tesla is openly manufacturing their own cathode and cells using internal and proprietary Tesla IP and patents.

VW is openly invested in Gotion who works with 6K energy for cathode and cells.

So what is the purpose of keeping working relationships with Nano a secret? And why do we always get updates about samples being sent for evaluation to prospective customers? What has the NDA being doing for all these years of not evaluating the cathode materials for a customer offtake agreement?

Something just feels totally nonsensical about the claim that Nano has all these NDAs with tier 1 auto OEMs. It just not seem to align with the reality of these tier-1 being very public with their actual real partnerships.

I smell a rat.

<< Previous

Bullboard Posts

Next >>

Fuel Meets Future: dynaCERT Shakes Up Heavy Industry in Munich