or
Remember me
Back
NDA = non-disclosure agreement. Non-disclosure means keeping your mouth shut. It's that simple! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-disclosure_agreement The less you hear about it, the better! We're hearing very, very little about it right now. Why, I wonder? We live in very interesting, life-changing times, let's not forget that! Patents protect intellectual property. Nano One Materials has maintained continuous IP management from the very beginning. They own a large patent portfolio (see presentation) and have international patents (North America, Europe, China, Korea) on everything they have researched (including together with their partners), because this is vital to their licensing strategy. 48 Patents Granted + 56 Pending https://nanoone.ca/investors/presentations/ What is there to doubt here? If they didn't act this way as a company, it would be absolutely stupid and negligent. Do you think the management of Nano One Materials is stupid and negligent? Really? "The likelihood that Tesla ever shells out a dime to Nano One approaches is close to zero percent. Which means Tesla is a direct competitor of Nano One. Not a collaborator. Sure Tesla might have learned everything they needed from Nano One. Just like Pulead did. And by the sounds of it, Saint Gobain. But what did sharing the technology with these consortium members get Nano One? Not a single penny to date. And in the meantime, Tesla now has all their very own IP and patents. And Saint Gobain now sells their own proprietary waste-free cathode synthesis route (e.g., to Mitra Chem)." You regularly post completely unrealistic assumptions here, and with incredible frequency, in international forums, without even considering how absurd what you're writing actually is. Manipulating the share price, in collusion with others, which they then cite as proof of how credible their statements are, otherwise no one would sell. (Not_Kom = Dot_Kom = Anxiety = Lawisfun) https://cdn-ceo-ca.s3.amazonaws.com/1iq163l-IMG_5737.png This has been going on for a very, very long time. First on ceo.ca and now here. https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard?symbol=t.nano&postid=36455322 What does this have to do with information sharing? There's clearly an unscrupulous financial interest behind it. It's an insult to the intelligence of the respective readers! Why hasn't Nano One Materials signed a contract yet? What do you think? What does the phrase "NATIONAL SECURITY" mean to you? And all this government support? https://nanoone.ca/news/nano-one-awarded-us12-9m-by-us-department-of-defense-to-support-the-expansion-of-north-american-lfp-production-at-candiac-facility/ That Nano One Materials will go bankrupt because all the other companies stole their ideas and their partners took advantage of them. They are therefore completely on their own and will have to sue to reclaim their patent rights? Do you actually realize how absurd what you're spouting here every day is? Have a nice Sunday.
Stay informed.
Receive investor kits and email updates from Stockhouse and directly from these companies.
