Worley has released their policy report and it is overwhelmingly clear that they are full steam ahead with Nano, which is great to see. It's definitely worth reading the entire document.
CLICK HERE to read.
On page 8, right hand side, you'll see SPECIFIC reference to Nano one, and the EXACT same language Nano uses.
STANDARDIZATION IS THE CONSISTENT SOLUTION:
The number of pre-cursor, active material and recycling facilities – plus the investment required to feed the demand for EVs – is significant.
Designing one, and then building many identical facilities is an obvious answer to this challenge. Concepts exist that would enable the battery materials industry, and therefore the world, to transition to an electrified future more quickly. But this is not without its own set of challenges to standardize what are extremely complex and large-scale processing facilities – akin perhaps to standardizing aircraft construction. But other industries have done it, and successfully. Benefits of a
‘design one, build many’ approach include lower overall capital investment levels, increased speed to market, and easier operation and maintenance. We expect new technology to lower operating costs and enable easier upgrades. And all this translates into lower investment risk. And perhaps most importantly, increased standardization and improved planning frees up precious engineering, construction and supply chain capacity; enabling a significantly faster transition to a sustainable future.