Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Nickel Creek Platinum Corp T.NCP

Alternate Symbol(s):  NCPCF

Nickel Creek Platinum Corp. is a Canada-based mining exploration and development company. The Company’s principal business activity is the exploration and evaluation of nickel and platinum group metals (PGM) mineral properties in North America. Its flagship asset is its 100%-owned nickel-copper PGM project, located in the Yukon Territory, Canada (Nickel Shaw Project). The project is in the... see more

TSX:NCP - Post Discussion

Nickel Creek Platinum Corp > WHAT DO I THINK ?
View:
Post by Wangotango67 on Oct 30, 2023 12:57am

WHAT DO I THINK ?

As much as i like JDS Engineer ( revealing rest of deposit ) grade blocks.


I think the inner core deposit
might not been factored into 2015 PEA.

- 2015 press + pea ( inner core ) was kept separate ( 2 charts )
- separate chart / graph for the high grade
- block grade modelling where underground mine is - vacant

- if one added up all other 2015  tonnage ( blocks grades ) outside of
  main mine area - these might match same tonnage as 330 million tonnes
  which was factored.

If inner core blocking = 245 million tonnes
Outside zone"  that is grade colored " could easily amount to extra - 330 million tonnes

Keeping a high grade zone separate while modelling mine
inconjunction of seeing grade blocks all white inside this underground mine zone
could provide clues needed to solve.

Fast forward to 2018 / 2023
Same numbers used from 2015 carried forward.
Same error... continues ?

An opinion.
Right ? Wrong ?
Anyone ?

Simply ask...
Why is it all white where the main mine should be ?

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53296587984_d7753e1316_c.jpg
Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities