Most all Canadaian Nickel junior's belong to - Net Zero. CNC - Net Zero
FPX - Net Zero
GIGA - Net Zero
NCP - Net Zero
EVNI - Clean Nickel ( form of Net Zero )
Too hard to secure a stainless steel conteact over seas ?
Then, make it happen on your own. CNC - seems to be the only nickel junior whose advancing with their own,
stainless steel plant.
NET ZERO COALITION https://www.unep.org/interactives/things-you-can-do-climate-emergency/ideas/ask-your-government-to-join-the-net-zero-coalition-in-line-with-the-paris-agreement.html https://www.unepfi.org/net-zero-banking/ https://nickelinstitute.org/en/blog/2021/october/nickel-and-net-zero/ AFRICA....? Western miners lag as oil powers enter race for Africa’s critical metals
https://www.mining.com/web/western-miners-lag-as-oil-powers-enter-race-for-africas-critical-metals/ How can Canada compete on the global scene when oil powers make a beeline for Africa ?
Is Net Zero doing enough for Canadian Nickel juniors ? Nickel juniors far more advanced with each project, some even brown field.
Or, will China, Indo, Africa trump Canadian Nickel juniors ?
If North American nickel juniors were truly in the game - we'd build our own nickel stockpiles and regulate own prices reflective in own products
- ensure ( foreign ) partnerships source Canadian Critical minerals
- permit Canadian nickel juniors the alloted CO2 SEQ value in economic reports
- and if not, then allow the nickel juniors -
$350/t MgO or... $3,500/t Mg Metal
Kind of odd, CO2 seq or Mg metal values are not seen in many
Canadian nickel junior - economic reports.
If we did see Mg dollar values ?
Most all Canadian nickel juniors would have robust economic reports
billions added... attracting lots of $$$ interests... and moving forward well
ahead of African green projects.
Has CO2 SEQ profit exclusions
in economic reports hindered Canadian nickel juniors
from competing with global peers ?
CO2 SEQ earmarked $50/t for each carbon tonne seq
After... 2022 - $15 increase = $65/t ( 20230)
And $15/t each year after capping out @ 2030
= $170/t by 2030 https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/pricing-pollution-how-it-will-work/carbon-pollution-pricing-federal-benchmark-information.html I only factored... 437,000,000 tonnes
x 16.9% magnesium
=
73,853,000 million tonnes Mg x $60 tonne ( extremely low estimate ) vs ( $350/t going rate )
= $4+ billion ( just magnesium )
With the VTOL markets taking off,
Imagine if the magnesium values were assigned - $350/t - $3,500/t ?
How many large shareholders bought the CO2 pitch while overlooking
the actual Mg value and ever increasing VTOL markets ?
Since FS study press release ?
Nearing 6 months.
Bravo.
Cheers...