or
Remember me
Back
I don't understand what you're getting at with this most recent post.
Maybe if you stated exactly what you think Mr Curleigh did that broke the law and then listed the specific facts that you rely on to come to your specific opinion.
I'm not going back to review the NRs that deal with the AMF. My recollection is that there was quite a lengthy investigation. I have to assume the AMF reviewed all aspects of the issues including what insiders were doing with their shares at all material times.
Would it not be obvious that if the AMF felt there were trades made by insiders based on information not available to the public that they would take action or refer the matter for criminal prosecution?
As I first mentioned, I really don't know exactly what you're claiming so my comments may not be relevant to whatever issues you're trying to claim exist
Receive investor kits and email updates from Stockhouse and directly from these companies.
