PyroGenesis Inc T.PYR

Lefebvre industri-al tech not disclosed

[Tcheck]

• The new process will have a direct impact on the environmental footprint, as it aims to reclaim 100% of aluminum dross while eliminating the need to transport and bury several thousand tonnes of dangerous residual materials.
• Since 2014, Lefebvre Industri-AL's team has been developing an innovative, non-polluting process to recover 100% of aluminum dross, while eliminating the production of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and use of polluting salts. In concrete terms, this process—expected to be implemented in 2020—will lead to the recovery of an additional 1500 tonnes of aluminum, and the elimination of over 11,600 tonnes of CO2 (GHGs) and 750 tonnes of polluting salts annually.

Still looking to discover their technology.
details not disclosed.
everybody is trying the same thing i guess with more or less success.
reducing GHG and dangerous residues while retrieving as much alu as possible .

there is competition out there which is a bit underestimated i find .;)

maybe pyr will come out with some contract soon to clarify the alu  situation in canada .who knows?
Cornering the Canadian alu market should be the most obvious target  for pyr and would be very lucrative indeed.i was surprised nothing happened 
with that .
 

we will have to eliminate obstacles,hurdles along the way :)
if we are the best this should not represent a problem

 

[Helenq]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[dougkimbrough]

Ohhh geez let me sell PYR for a company that is DEVELOPING and AIMING to recover 100% aluminum dross... Key take aways from this is PYR has actually SOLD and PROVEN our drossrite tech and this other company wishes to get research done to ATTEMPT TO SELL??? Seems PYR is DEFINITELY ahead of them because the other company is AIMING to do what PYR can already do!!!

[canyousayiii]

I think you missed the part "to be implemented in 2020" and the mention of at least one Alcoa plant. Where there is money to be made and where there is a real problem there will be competition, and that is not a bad thing. All things being similar, cost effectiveness will be key. I think Tcheck is sensitizing us to the fact that PYR is not the only game in town and that is the reason for

[dougkimbrough]

No YOU MISSED the part that says "EXPECTED to be implemented" funny how you decided to leave the word EXPECTED out!

[dougkimbrough]

And just so you know it's 2021 so OBVIOUSLY the other company is STILL researching while PYR is bidding on a 40 million dollar contract!!!

[canyousayiii]

There you go. As per my last reply to you, without more information, there are different possible interpretations. And we don't know how covid may have impacted the timeline. In any case, I think the point is that we are not the only player in town (world) for this and I hope you are not suggesting any company having a monopoly position. That's all...nothing more, nothing less.

[canyousayiii]

You are right, I missed "expected" because the year 2020 is the key thing that struck me and that with the mention of Alcoa I assumed that a contract was signed. It is 2021. We don't know what happened but it appears that the opportunity for such a system was at least initially provided to an Alcoa customer.

[dougkimbrough]

Oh you ASSUME that that company made a sell but yet where's the proof??? We all KNOW PYR has sold drossrite and has a backlog to be filled!!! But yet you want people to believe that that company is actually competing? Show me their sale to show me they are competition!!!                                    

[canyousayiii]

I do not have a the contract or a newsrelease. Do you have proof that PYR is competing for this particular business/location? And do you have proof that Drosrite is part of the pipeline esitmate? I don't want to make people believe anything just making a general point based on that one example. But since you seem so offended by such a general statement and seem to have very particular

[dougkimbrough]

The 65 million dollars in contracts in 6 months (PYR has STATED that is LOW BALLING IT) and the 40 million bid that we are expecting news on in about 3 months is OBVIOUSLY NOT included in that 65 million figure. Look over end of year and q4 report and Peters agoracom post about the 65 million and maybe you can understand!

[canyousayiii]

Thank you dougk, but I read that material and fully understand what it means, and how far I can take that info, in addition to other. So, you do not have any proof that PYR is competing for the contract that seemingly Lefebvre Industri-Al has? In that case it would be fair to say there is a range of scenarios like I proposed.

[dougkimbrough]

Show me Lefebvre Industri-Al's contract that YOU KEEP ASSUMING they have.

[canyousayiii]

Thete was a press release strongly suggesting they are doing business. Show me even a press release from PYR that they are competing for that particular business. I assume you have something to come out swinging this hard on a point that is not really debatable. Be careful what you post in the future if you seek contracts as a burden of proof. Give it up, buddy, you caused a gunfight and showed up

[dougkimbrough]

Drossrite DWARFS that other companies ZERO dollar contract!!! Additive manufacturing has got me ready to buy today and I can tell you are upset about PYRs news release!!!!You're free to pi$$ yourself now! Good bye scum

[canyousayiii]

Don't start a discussion you cannot finish. I am happy for today's news and for you because clearly you were having a bit of a breakdown before it. Not sure why. Don't be afraid of your own shadow, dougk. And remember, it is good to have business competition in some areas, it means that there is a need and money to be made. Enjoy your day.

[Casavantsghost]

Are you saying you are not aware of Peter’s own words stating they’ve put in a bid for a 40 million dollar contract? It was a video of him stating this so I’m not sure how you missed it.

[canyousayiii]

No. That was not part of the discussion, unless you are saying that the $40 million tender process is for this particular plant meaning that something changed from Tchek's published information. I did not see that part. Is that what you are saying?

[Casavantsghost]

No I am not saying it is part of "this" plant. Just stating that there is a bid in for $40 million and it was not disseminated with who the client was for this bid. Could be they, could be someone else. 

[Stitches]

You, I and every poster on this board knows that no corporation is going to show their hand as to what deal they are bidding on. There are disclosure laws, and there is corporate secrets that keep them from doing this. Until they come out with a statement, EVERYTHING you read on these boards is nothing but pure speculation and here say.  Stitches