PyroGenesis Inc T.PYR

Raphaelle2 is downplaying everything

[ScienceFirst]

Ever noticed that anything that comes out of PYR is never enough, always not important.

His last one;  Boeing would have used PYR titanium powder, for no real reasons, in 2 research papers!

The clown is part of the FUD squad.

[raphaelle2]

Poor SF, You continue to confirm that anything seriously related to scientific affairs is well above your paygrade. These types of publications are typical of routine DOE/university research activities. This is how you can keep an eye on activities of potential interest. It is also a cheap way to obtain this information at a lowecost (thanks to R&D credits granted to large companies). Now

[ScienceFirst]

Raphaelle2 ... We're aware of your hidden agenda.  Part of the FUD squad. Show us one single post where you are not soft bashing on any OYR business lines, any news releases. Can wait to read you.  But so far, I've never seen one.  Prove me wrong.

[raphaelle2]

SF, You are right . About 99+%. And I am also right by the same ratio... The difference between you and me...I am an experienced technical expert in this field ( HT, metallurgy,plasma and their commercialisation...with small and large Co)...and in addition,my calls are backed by PYR financials ( or lack of...). Dont get me wrong. I find no satisfaction with this situation. My message to this

[ScienceFirst]

Raphaelle2... Don't want to rain on your competencies but there are couple of top minds at PYR on the plasma side. PYR is also doing collaborations with McGill too, etc ... and so far. nobody except them have been able to satisfy the US Navy. But I see your how you're also telling half-stories and playing thee armchair quarterback when you post. You simply lack insights as this is

[raphaelle2]

No offense SF...the Qc plasma community is really tiny, between McGill and the University of Sherbrooke (after Hydro Quebec abandoned this area at the end of the last century) and know each other well. I know Pierre Carabin and I have even collaborated with other experts, some of them now retired from PYR, involved in the atomization and incineration of plasma for example. Yes, their portable

[ScienceFirst]

Raphaelle2 ... There's a cost to everything. Do you think that landfills, that are full and that must be increased (Drummondville, etc ...), recycling (that's still ineffective in 2023) and the inefficient 4 biomathanization plants built in Montreal and that all busted their budgets, don't have a cost??? Lets see what VALE and Rio Tinto have to say about our torches in their

[ScienceFirst]

Raphaelle2 ... There's a cost to everything. Do you think that landfills, that are full and that must be increased (Drummondville, etc ...), recycling (that's still inefficient in 2023) and the inefficient 4 biomathanization plants built in Montreal and that all busted their budgets, don't have a cost??? Lets see what VALE and Rio Tinto have to say about our torches in their

[ScienceFirst]

Rapahelle2 ...  Because you're so convinced, as per your own allusion, even ahead of the Clients final decisions (Boeing for the 3d-printing powder certification and Vale and Rio Tinto for the iron pelletization SAT tests), tell us, for these 2 business lines, why exactly it's not gonna work. I assume you have enough technical details to give us, given all you many posts that are 99%

[raphaelle2]

Dear SF. My posts are not negative. They are just realistic! OK, just for you: ( last time) 1-Vale: Read THEIR last year many PR on pelletization: "All future decisions to heat our pellets furnaces will be hydrogen compatible."  Meanwhile, they secured 5-6 yers of guaranteed natural gaz for ALL their furnaces. Period. 2- RIO, I pass ( NDA). 3- Boeing. I would do the same thing

[ScienceFirst]

Oh boy! Is this your best Raphaelle2?  Gees! About your #1 ... Peter debunked you recently.  Natural gas is NOT Permanent. And why would VALE waste their precious time on something they don't need or don't want. And hydrogen is a long shot. About your #3 ...  Boeing would NOT waste its time either.  Technical steps have to translate into

[ScienceFirst]

And while you're there Raphaelle2, give us also you're advice on QRR and why it will not work. After all, PYR went from an idea to a GEN3 version and  now about the confirm the pour of 2N silicon within weeks.  All this, in 1 step.  So far, so good.  While you've been a naysayer since inception. Please try before tomorrow 11:00.