Comment by
whaler83 on Oct 08, 2021 11:55am
i like how they are laughing at the Apple lawyer. And regarding damages about the $10M Apple belief is basically a joke and they know it. Based on nothing.
Comment by
whaler83 on Oct 08, 2021 12:00pm
atleast taking our judge more seriously and not laughing at him
Comment by
whaler83 on Oct 08, 2021 12:01pm
sorry: atleast taking our LAWYER more seriously and not laughing at him
Comment by
whaler83 on Oct 08, 2021 12:10pm
yikes...unecto license screwing us. How oculd Skippen have made a mistake like this? considering this patent as a throw in?
Comment by
whaler83 on Oct 08, 2021 12:23pm
its so obvious the way these judges lean towards apple becaue they all have investments in apple.
Comment by
whaler83 on Oct 08, 2021 12:24pm
lets just keep re-trying the cae until apple gets the outcome that they want of $10M
Comment by
cabbieJBJ on Oct 08, 2021 12:25pm
Whaler, please put the tinfoil away.
Comment by
wilander on Oct 08, 2021 12:29pm
I never heard we wanted the original settlement from the first jury. Did I miss something?
Comment by
whaler83 on Oct 08, 2021 12:31pm
just extraoplating what i can from the legal jargin. Sperating the wheat from the chaff (reference from todays oral hearing) as best i can... i would love to hear other opinions on how it went
Comment by
ChiChi3 on Oct 08, 2021 12:32pm
That didn`t go as well as I would have hoped for. Any thoughts from others? Stock is still holding up though Chi