Post by
Schussing56 on Aug 11, 2022 8:49am
Why the Dip?
In my opinion, yesterday's dip had nothing to do with the numbers and, everything to do with the announced retirement of Luc Desjardins. When he took over this company, they were heavily in debt, the share price had dipped to nearly $5, and prospects looked slim. Desjardins focused the company, got debt down to reasonable levels, sold off non-core assets, signed deals with major players, etc. Remember, a company is only as good as their management. Desjardins' retirement is significant and, there is no guarantee SPB will find somebody as good, to replace him.
Comment by
bttmfischer on Aug 11, 2022 9:54am
"good enough" is a proper way to put it. I would like to use the analogy "Winston Churchill was a very good war-time prime minister, but less than mediocre in peacre and recovery." I did not like deal Luc made for hydrogene with that Quebec group. There are a lot of unknowns. And the derivatives? Why does Superior need to do that?
Comment by
bttmfischer on Aug 11, 2022 10:07am
Another thing. While Brookfield does have a significant interest in Superior, but Marquard and Bahls now owns about 20% of the company, and they may be wispering in the years of the board members of SPB about the right choices for a new CEO.
Comment by
Baystboy07 on Aug 11, 2022 5:08pm
On the conference call yesterday Luc danced arp7nd a question on a strategic review being performed by the Board upon his retirement...he answered it in the context of $SPBs acquisition strategy and the analyst was asking about $SPB itself...next Few months will be interesting...GLTA
Comment by
Baystboy07 on Aug 12, 2022 2:49pm
I am not missing the point at all...if you listened to the call the analyst asked if the BOard will undertake a strategic review of the company with the CEO retirement....ie..put the Company up for sale...Luc sort of ignored him and answered it from $SPBs acquisition strategy...I think this Company gets sold in the next 12 months. GLTA
Comment by
bttmfischer on Aug 12, 2022 3:07pm
Was the possible sale of CHE mentioned at all during the calls, or is that your own hypothesis? Now if we can rely on the report on insider trading of CHE(which is a maybe at best), there was very little buying by insiders. Usually when there are arbitrage people sniffing, insiders would buy shares.
Comment by
bttmfischer on Aug 14, 2022 9:17pm
I am truly sorry folks...Wrong board. I've never done this before, but who knows, I might be getting the Biden disease, and this is the first sign of it. Scary indeed
Comment by
Bigbear7405 on Aug 31, 2022 5:01pm
Way better than the Trump disease
Comment by
pjn0987654321 on Aug 12, 2022 5:36pm
I wouldn't say no to $100 a share and if we get there, I will reconsider my opinion of Luc.