Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Teck Resources Ord Shs Class A T.TECK.A

Alternate Symbol(s):  TCKRF | TECK | T.TECK.B

Teck Resources Limited is a Canadian resource company. The Company operates a portfolio of copper and zinc operations across North and South America. The Company’s operations and projects include Antamina, Cardinal River, Galore Creek Project, Carmen de Andacollo, Highland Valley Copper, Trail Operations, Quebrada Blanca, Carmen de Andacollo, HVC Mine Life Extension Project, Galore Creek... see more

TSX:TECK.A - Post Discussion

Teck Resources Ord Shs Class A > Slippery slope - Legally
View:
Post by 4CommonSense on May 23, 2023 8:59pm

Slippery slope - Legally

Given that the BoD has a fiduciary responsibility to act in the best interests of the COMPANY (and all the S/Hs). Is it in the best interests of the COMPANY (vs. the wishes of a single S/H or some 3rd party) to keep the company "Canadian" at any cost? 

The Glencore bid has set a minimum value for company. Whatever scheme is developed to split the company has to create and something of equal value for the company (and s/hs).
 
This "Canadian' arguement is really a lot of smoke and mirrors i.e., BS. Most of Teck's metal assets are outside Canada (ignoring TRAIL which is probably more of a liability than asset in the future). Many S'/Hs are not Canadians. The CEO is English and is also located outside. Glencore also already has significant mining assets in Canada. 

Therefore, it appears the issue is ownership and control of the COAL mines and if they have to be  owned by Candians. Do we really want the coal mines to be owned by Canadians in any case and/or do the S/Hs really care? (it might be better that they aren't).

What course of action is in the 'best interest' of the COMPANY? If Glencore is correct, maybe the combined companies are in the best interst of both Teck and Glencore...Glencore appears to have a creditable opinion about this.
Comment by 4CommonSense on May 26, 2023 12:50pm
based on its past lattempts with this type of strategic move it will be a miracle if Teck doesn't screw this up -- There is a significant risk from a Teck B  perspective this will happen IMHO don't worry about the A's - they always come first and on top  Tick! Tick!! Tick!!!
Comment by spitfire191 on Jun 02, 2023 10:50am
Been busy the last few weeks and see my A shares have tanked an are the price of B shares....what happened?
Comment by jrj90620 on Jun 03, 2023 2:46pm
I don't know what happened to the A stock.I went to Yahoo,where they show the daily close.It appears something happened over the weekend after May 19.Volume went way up and price adjusted to same as B stock. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/TECK-A.TO/history?p=TECK-A.TO
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities