Post by
jfm1330 on Jun 13, 2023 11:09am
Very encouraging, but approval will take time
Finally we got some meat on the bone. Why did they wait six months to provide more clarity on efficacy related to stable disease. Why did they not tell us that some patients took the drug, stoped it and their cancer were stable for a long time afterward. It seems that they have a approvable drug based on progression free survival criteria, but it will take time to achieve that. It won't be a fast track approval. Also, it seems potential for combination therapy is high, also potential to develop other PDCs. Their problem now is money. They need to sell this story in a much better way. Also, potential for partnership is high because they need the money. Takeovers are rare in biopharmas/biotechs, but they clearly are a cheap target.
Comment by
SPCEO1 on Jun 13, 2023 11:38am
To me, the biopsy situation is as clear as mud. It was mentioned in the poster and again today but I don't believe every patient is biopsied. My cousin was not biopsied as far as I know.
Comment by
juniper88 on Jun 13, 2023 11:51am
My wife had the biopsy done. And as far as I know it is mandatory for every patient.
Comment by
jfm1330 on Jun 13, 2023 1:01pm
My understanding is that they stopped the trial because the see this drug as a drug for chronic use, so longer term use and patients can stay on a drug for a longer period of time only if toxic side-effects are relatively low. In my fourth month of chemo, I can tell you that it is a very important criteria. You need to retain a decent quality of life to stay on a drug long term.
Comment by
jfm1330 on Jun 13, 2023 1:06pm
I know it's not very important at this point, but it's worth noting that if the new protocol works, this drug will be high a high maintenance drug with three IV infusions per month, every month. Better start thinking now about an IV push formulation!!!