Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum TELESTA THERAPEUTICS INC T.TST

"Telesta Therapeutics Inc is a biopharmaceutical company. The Company is engaged in the research, development, manufacturing and commercialization of human health products and technologies."

TSX:TST - Post Discussion

TELESTA THERAPEUTICS INC > Try this math...
View:
Post by rgonlyfactspls on Jan 08, 2016 2:54pm

Try this math...

27%-18%=9% and 9%/18%= +50% (i.e., better) The drug related to the figure "27%" was just voted down at its AdCom meeting. The drug related to the figure "18%" is FDA approved. The former drug (at 27%) is also considerably more safe for patents and medical staff. Comparison is for exactly the same indication. Now bold this date on your calendar (unless HT just started his value-add countdown): FDA's PDUFE review/decision for MCNA > Feb. 27-16. Excerpts re stats: 1) "In a subpopulation of subjects with CIS-containing disease who received MCNA treatment, 27% of subjects experienced CR at 6 months that appeared to be durable without cystectomy." Source: FDA Briefing Document, pg 46. 2) Valstar clinical trial results: "In the 90 study patients with BCG-refractory carcinoma in situ (CIS), 16 patients (18%) had a complete response at 6 months." https://1.usa.gov/1O5xyFa
Comment by ragingbull1327 on Jan 08, 2016 3:48pm
I didn't take the time to read the body of your message, but I believe the answer is 39.5 cents.   Which is actually far more credit than I gave you people and your stock.  That's all you see here. You don't see life, death, OR stupidity.    You block me like you block all of the other problems you've created by NOT DEALING WITH THE ISSUES.   Like I said ...more  
Comment by ragingbull1327 on Jan 08, 2016 3:56pm
Your horses have taken so long, no one even cares who wins the race anymore.   It's beyond a reasonable time frame to celebrate any potential success.   Everyone has failed.   You'd like to think that there could be a celebration party upon approval, but anyone who could do such a thing is exactly why we still suck.   They think they've "won something" ...more  
Comment by ragingbull1327 on Jan 08, 2016 4:02pm
I imagine that people came up with the religious philosophies and wrote out their holy books faster than this, and that was thousands of years ago.   My, we've come a long way.....  Look at us goooooooo!   ;)
Comment by ragingbull1327 on Jan 08, 2016 4:14pm
We set pretty low goals for ourselves.   It takes a decade TO SIMPLY ASSESS AND APPROVE A CANCER TREATMENT?     That sucks.  I was under the impression that some people in this world were brilliant.   If NO ONE can figure out to stop genetic mutation from happening, then I'd say in the grandest of schemes, we are all the same.   Incapable.   So why put the ...more  
Comment by ragingbull1327 on Jan 08, 2016 4:29pm
Anyone else under the impression that someone or something is trying to hold us back from advancing technologically?     Artificially I mean.   If I had to guess, I'd say the government is trying to get ready for a Brave New World, and things could get potentially out of hand and start moving too fast for them to control.    Since control is the only thing that they ...more  
Comment by ragingbull1327 on Jan 08, 2016 4:31pm
I said 20 years.    That's not too far away.   Two "back-to-back" drug approval process for the FDA.  Peanuts
Comment by ragingbull1327 on Jan 08, 2016 4:40pm
I'll stop for a while now, but I just wanted to add that the same people who hit "ignore" on a public forum, are the same people who would run from daesh or any other group.    We don't need people like this.   We need people who will stand and fight, not close their eyes and run away.   As far as I can tell, everyone has been far too amicable in their ...more  
Comment by CasusRisen on Jan 08, 2016 9:32pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by HighteawithIntrepid on Jan 08, 2016 10:19pm
CR given that most of us have had RB on ignore  for months our collective thought would be that if he ever has a rational post repost it but beyond that I will  try not to post until there is some real news or we hit day 40 to go. HT
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities