Comment by BlueHorseshoe90on Nov 26, 2021 12:36pm

92 Views
Post# 34169569
RE:RE:A win in Kanata
RE:RE:A win in KanataNice win for us. On close reading I see that the appeal judge agreed that Sections 5 and 9 (which created the City's interest in the land) were invalid, but did not agree that those clauses were necessarily integral to the contract, as Clublink had argued. Therefore he declined to rule on the validity of the contract as a whole. So... maybe not a completely clean win?