Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Pacific Booker Minerals Inc V.BKM

Alternate Symbol(s):  PBMLF

Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. is a Canadian natural resource exploration company. The Company’s principal business activity is the exploration of its mineral property interests, with its principal mineral property interests located in Canada. The Company is in the advanced stage of exploration of the Morrison deposit, a porphyry copper/gold/molybdenum ore body, located approximately 35... see more

TSXV:BKM - Post Discussion

Pacific Booker Minerals Inc > Federal Election
View:
Post by dano123 on Sep 05, 2021 5:00pm

Federal Election

Under Stephen Harper our mine was approved and the finding was no adverse affects. The certificate was to be issued when provincial eac was issued. Then province turned us down and the federal approval was on wait. Then Trudeau came to power and changed the enviornment process (dumb bunny) and so am not sure where we are. One thing I do know is our project would be federally quickly approved if conservatives get a majority as we already had approval under Harper so we know conservatives are for business and for mining and liberals are for nothing but giving tax payers away to people who don't contribute much. This is just my opinion but will be voting for the obvious choice as I see it.
Comment by dano123 on Sep 05, 2021 5:08pm
line 11 should say giving tax payers money away
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities