Post by
radar17 on Jun 21, 2018 12:13pm
The point remains that investors and the public
were led to believe it was basically as good as done and all that remained was to get a couple signatures. Either that was the truth or that was ... not the truth. And THAT was back on May 18th, over 32 days ago...
"While TU could not provide the exact date for the release, as it is depended on these individuals’ schedules, they provided additional confidence that the funds are ready to be released and only waiting on these sign offs."
And it gets worse because before that it was claimed that..."The Corporation had previously announced that the agreements were to be completed by the end of March"
$100 million ... "Oops" doesn't cut it.
Never mind the weirdness that is somebody paying $3 per share for a stock trading at 30 to 40 cents?? Still haven't figured that one out.
Comment by
jimjones18 on Jun 21, 2018 12:36pm
It would make absolutely no sense to pay 10 times the price for that investment. Instead look at your investment as any type of small to medium sized good news and this stock will double. Then sell and go on to the next one. But thinking we will go from $0.50 to $4 anytime soon is childish at best.
Comment by
radar17 on Jun 21, 2018 1:13pm
Maybe the poster that claimed to be the CEO could explain how he got someone to pay $3 for a 30 to 40 cent per share stock, and $100 million worth at that!! Cause I don't remember reading anywhere about a 1:10 share rollback.
Comment by
jimjones18 on Jun 21, 2018 1:32pm
Thing is the CEO didn't get anyone to pay $3 for a 30 to 40 cent per share stock.... We're all still waiting
Comment by
radar17 on Jun 22, 2018 1:11am
LOL "It was exsplained why... I’m not going to find it for you." Seriously? That's all you've got?