Post by
boazklinghorn on Nov 29, 2023 1:07pm
Failure, again.
Apparently there is no amount of failure that this board won't indulge. The language about a solid base business and slow ordering is gone so we can assume ten million is the new revenue run rate. Gilles had one thing and that was the reliable base business that he always claimed to have built, well that's gone. Now his tenure is literally one of is failure at every single step. And yet he still has a job, amazing.
Comment by
boazklinghorn on Nov 29, 2023 1:32pm
If I had a dollar for everything Gilles said that eventually came to pass I would have ZERO EFFING DOLLARS. So I will take this latest statement with a bucket of salt.
Comment by
boazklinghorn on Nov 29, 2023 1:34pm
And the market is again voting with its feet and getting out of CZO at any price.
Comment by
boazklinghorn on Nov 29, 2023 1:42pm
Of course Gilles is hiding from analysts and shareholders as usual so there will be no additional details about anything. What an A whole
Comment by
ZoranSto on Nov 29, 2023 2:23pm
Ohhh...Gilles says.....So we can believe him this time???? How about all the other times he has been wrong ..... so what Gilles says does not hold water anymore.
Comment by
Tencents on Nov 29, 2023 3:21pm
In general 10 % of candidates get to market and this will probably be in 2035 - Gagnon says in 7 years - and also none of them might get there With current r&d spend ( and relatively enormous admin spend) a cash crunch is probable end 2024 A major impulsion of different approachs seems necessary
Comment by
Tencents on Nov 29, 2023 5:08pm
Indeed - true about Avalyn but note it took 13 years to get there and they have about 6 candidates in this area Still have years to go to get a product in the market
Comment by
Tencents on Nov 29, 2023 3:27pm
In general 10 % of candidates get to market and this will probably be in 2035 - Gagnon says in 7 years - and also none of them might get there With current r@d spend ( and relatively enormous admin spend) a cash crunch is probable end 2024 A major impulsion of different approachs seems necessary
Comment by
Ciao on Nov 29, 2023 2:41pm
He "claimed" to have built but when asked in a webcast a few years ago, he admitted he did nothing to grow the base business (which is true). He's been on auto pilot for a decade and just dabbled in moving PGX through academia (no accountability) vs. engaging commercial partners (accountability for sure).
Comment by
PBaelishh on Nov 29, 2023 2:49pm
...WHILE the PGX PATENT marches towards EXPIRING. Is there even 3 years left on it?!! Anything developed with PGX now will be more of a gift to the industry as opposed to a gold mine for Ceapro.