Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Frontier Lithium Inc V.FL

Alternate Symbol(s):  LITOF

"Frontier Lithium Inc is a Canada-based mining exploration company engaged in acquisition, exploration, and development of mining properties. It focuses on elements like lithium, tantalum, rubidium, and cesium by exploring for lithium, cesium and tantalum classified pegmatites. Geographically it operates in one segment, Canada. Its main project is the PAK lithium project."


TSXV:FL - Post by User

Comment by qwerty22on Jun 02, 2023 2:37pm
108 Views
Post# 35477445

RE:CG analyst “largely negative”

RE:CG analyst “largely negative”

Maybe managements conservative approach to the numbers has bitten them in the proverbial. Seems like this analyst is looking at the bottom line and concluding from that alone.


qwerty22 wrote: See any more?

In response to the release of the results of a Pre-Feasibility Study for the PAK Lithium Project, Canaccord Genuity’s Katie Lachapelle cut her Frontier Lithium Inc. (FL-X) target to $4, below the $4.08 average, from $4.50 with a “speculative buy” recommendation. “The PFS results were largely negative relative to our forecasts and the PEA, with both capital and operating costs up materially (but offset by higher pricing),” she said. “In our view, this was not surprising, given recent inflationary pressures we’ve seen across the industry (e.g., Thacker Pass, Kathleen Valley, etc.); and overall, we think the updated technical report outlines a more realistic operational and financial outcome for Frontier. “Furthermore, the project still presents robust operating margins (approximately 65 per cent) on our long-term price deck and Frontier continues to screen cheap vs. other North American developer peers (0.53 times NAV vs. peers at 0.62 times). An update on the road infrastructure will be a critical next update for the company, in our view.”

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>