Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Galway Resources Ltd V.GWY

TSXV:GWY - Post Discussion

Galway Resources Ltd > Math For The Arbs
View:
Post by SchiffKnowsBest on Oct 20, 2012 7:14am

Math For The Arbs

Things to keep in mind in my math.  Us as shareholders will receive $2.05/share for our assets and liabilities.  This means that Eike will be paying out our BMO loan, this also means he will be getting the money from the warrants and options being exercised.  As well, it sounds like he is funding Vetas and Victorio (for a total of $30,000,000) which is on top of our $2.05/share.  With this in mind, the calculation is very simple.

 

144,276,676 shares outstanding

 

Total deal for Cali =  $295,767,185 ($2.05 * 144,276,676)

 

Cash invested in new companies = $30,000,000

 

=  $325,767,185  Cash Value

 

Divided by shares outstanding -----144,276,676

 

= $2.25  (For our cash only!)

 

Yes that's right.....$2.25 cash value.  That is allocating $0 FOR VETAS (besides the cash injection).  If you are selling this for less than $2.25 then you really need a swift kick in the rear.  Let's say Victorio is only worth the cash that is invested in it for argument sake and to be conservative.  Let me take a crack at a conservative estimate for Vetas....

 

There will definitely be 1 million ounces at a higher grade than California, based on the following:

 

"The initial corporate goal was to delineate resources of one million ounces from Vetas by drilling off an area of 500 metres along strike by 500 metres depth below the mine workings. Using an average horizontal mining width of 1.5 metres, a grade of 15 g/t and with a 25-per-cent success ratio over the mine's eight veins would give one million ounces. The actual average horizontal mining width has been exceeded, the success ratio has been exceeded, the depth has been exceeded and the number of veins present is greater than the eight originally thought to exist. As such, Galway intends to issue a robust gold and silver resource estimate for Vetas in the second half of 2013".

 

Now, let's be conservative here and say we have 1 million ounces today to therefore not worry about the time value of money.  Our grade will be greater than California by what Hinchcliffe has reported and we're probably in the ballpark of 8g/tonne average grade.  With that in mind, we should not get the average $30/ounce as most juniors are getting (Danny Deadlock's calculations).  We should be at least in the $50 range and that is being conservative.  Using $50/ounce and 1 million ounces, we come up with an additional $50,000,000 on top of our cash.  I'll likely get shot by using that low of a valuation, but I have been conservative all along and continuing down that path.  Vetas will go for much,much,much,much more than that, but that's what I am using for now.  I would even speculate Rob was offered at least that from Eike and he turned it down.  After all, Vetas was being held back for a while as well so you can bet they were in the negotiations.

 

Add  $50,000,000 for Vetas and here is where we are at as a conservative estimate for the whole company.

 

$325,767,185 Cash Value  +  $50,000,000 (Vetas)

 

Divided by Shares outstanding  144,276,676

 

= $2.60

 

Now, do we want to discount the Cali transaction back from December?  Since we likely need to take into consideration the time value of money for the December Cali Transaction.  Let's discount 5% to be again conservative and we're down to $2.50!

 

And there you have it folks, that's where I got my original $2.50 "you deserve to be shot if you sell it for under that estimate".  The upside is much more than that if you are willing to be patient and get a 43-101 out for Vetas, but for now this is where I am at for a conservative price tag.

Comment by SchiffKnowsBest on Oct 20, 2012 7:34am
Darn it....Forgot about owning 90% of Vetas through the transaction instead of 100%.  Take $7,000,000 (1$1.8mm cash for vetas, and $5mm for my value of Vetas on top of cash) off my calcs or approximately ~5 cents/share.  I am likely too conservative as is, but for those of you who are sticklers this should serve you well. 
Comment by fisherman8 on Oct 20, 2012 9:46am
Shiff;  I agree with your assessment.  Longer term, I believe Vetas has allot more upside value.  I my opinion it is not a great deal, but a fair deal. I was away Friday and did not get into the action. I will be adding to my already large GWY position next week. Longer term I see the Vetas area consolidating as well. With Batista having 10% there will competion with ...more  
Comment by dontgiveup on Oct 20, 2012 10:21am
RJ got it right again with the valuation of $2.50. The next update should be interesting. I have been an owner for years now going in an out of the stock. I will add next week.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities