Post by
patience123 on Jan 09, 2021 1:20pm
I dont see any reason why silicon
Cant replace graphite completely. Silicons ability to store ions is vastly superior to graphite if it outperforms or is at least on par with graphite charging cycles and is as physically stable as graphite then whats the head scratcher? Elon even said himself they will gravitate towards a battery with more and more silicon. He gives it a time frame of another three years or so im willing to bet it will be a lot sooner. What would it cost to build say 20 nano silicon reactors if you had unlimited wealth and rescources. How many other big players out there who would give anything to to to take the advantage and lead in front of Elon just as a pure lust for control of the space! Gonna get interesting for sure once the electrical properties of this stuff is proven in my opinion to be vastly superior. The next step is who wants it badly enough!
Regards
Comment by
TITANIUMJOE on Jan 09, 2021 6:28pm
If you watch all of the recent YouTube videos on the limiting factor channel they explain that the benefits start to decline once you go higher than 30% silicon. Of course this may be solved by using a different electrolyte or with further advancements but so far a 30% silicon anode looks to be the most promising.