HPQ Silicon Inc V.HPQ

New interview

[Renaissance]

[LivingTheDream1]

The market continues to yawn at these so called advances HPQ is making. Why is that? Bernard should look in the mirror and see that all of his previously over hyped R&D projects have amounted to absolutely nothing. It's not the so called fudsters that cause a $0.21 share price, it is the result of actions by the individual who heads up the company. Time to be held accountable Bernard. 

[Mostlyserious]

What a surprise, an Agoracom interview after the news release. So close to making it through the interview without alleging paid fudsters.  Except this time it is BT raising his hand literally at the end to go there and virtually promise that the share price will go up.  I would suggest that he could cement that conviction by buying a meaningful amount of shares on the open market

[KrapShoet]

Kinda funny blaming your lack of understanding and confusion on the CEO.  Seriously, anyone that has done their dd should have no problem following the content...it's actually pretty clear. I had a laugh on your confusion going from 5% to 10%....you're in the wrong stock if you couldn't even follow that logic.

[Mostlyserious]

When you lose significant amount of money on a stock, you are definitely in the wrong one! So, let's agree on the facts as stated in the interview: - incorporation of pure silicon into graphite anodes does not work - it has been found that using SiOx works very well and everyone has a different recipe of how they get it - incorporation of HPQ's SIOx into the battery according to their

[KrapShoet]

Everyone doesn't have a green SIOx solution. Only HPQ offers a green solution. Others use Silane gas which is definitely not green. The non green solutions are actually pretty standard in the process they follow. What they add and the % blend of materials is what differs.  So BT was correct in what he stated. Hopefully this clarifies your confusion.    Everyone doesn'

[Mostlyserious]

Sorry, these are the details that did not come out of the interview.   i don't believe one bit that somebody can claim that they are the only ones doing something in the world or doing it better.  Sorry, the world is big, HPQ's stuff is still not commercial and you nor he cannot possibly know about all the R and D taking place in such an important and big market space. SiOx

[Zinzin]

Please do not quote guys who are basher. I put them in my ignore list.

[Mostlyserious]

Bonjour Zinzin.  You are discouraging pumpers to answer questions of what was said in the interview?  You don't want him to even confirm what was said in the interview to help readers of the forum increase their understanding? Wow!  Why is that? Why wouldn't you take the opportunity to comment positively?  Unless you can't. You call me a basher yet I provide most

[BCONTVentures]

Great interview by Bernard.  The user @Vestor111 from ceo brings up a great point (on HPQ Silicon's Fumed Silica Reactor): @Vestor111 Re-look at the comparison at 26:50 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETA8zCMLi0A&t=1610s @Vestor111 One of the few point George has made that is very valid and not overstated. Few times in any established industrial process do you see one or

[Breizh01]

So you heard it on this video, George is silly with approach. Both must have bad nights, seeing FUSTERS wherever they go. Bernard makes a brief statement about the disaster about the nano silicon ... big mistake. So i understand that the QRR is basically useless from this quote. I have to review and see at what time he says this. No mention of a progress report to be expected. Research in the dark

[Breizh01]

Listen to the «interview» starting at 13:50 for about 3 min. and you will hear BT mention that the nano  silicon approach was a complete failure. And now they are seriously looking at what others are doing ; ie: mix of graphite and silicon particles to achieve serious success. I may have missed the signal and BT did not broadcat the testing failures. So do not be surprised if BT and

[KrapShoet]

George Silly with approach? QRR basically useless? What video were you watching lol. I mean I recognize from your lack of proper sentence structure etc that English isn't your primary language but come on lol

[Mostlyserious]

Just after the 14 minute mark, Bernard states that the nano-silicon experience was a complete failure.  Never been able to get one thing to kick in in any of the batteries. This is much, much closer to the actual quote than my paraphrase or interpretation. Discussion after the 19 minute mark brings QRR into the picture.  He states that QRR is not a prerequisite for the Novacium process.

[dalesio_98]

George and BT ought to be selling pizzas due to low credibility.

[Bajabeacher]

Really there dalesio...are you trying to be funny. Very unproffesional...have a nice weakend folks.

[dalesio_98]

Is it professional and funny when George and BT bring up FUD, fudsters and they are not selling pizzas? Actually, not selling anything. :( Way past the time to move on from Agora for the sake of credibility. Good luck to all!

[dalesio_98]

BTW, the HPQ market, based on the reception and share price, isn't a laughing matter.

[Mostlyserious]

Just for KrapShoet who alleges I am lying about the interview. Here's a post about couple of things I said backed up by specific references to where they came from.  Feel free to correct any inaccuracies.  Do listen to the entire interview. The explanation about Purevap NSiR comes from September 30, 2023 financial statements, Note 11. Over to you KrapShoet.  Explain how

[IvanVanBeethoven]

To avoid deception and misinterpretation about the NSIR: The exact quote of Bernard in the interview...   “The entire nano Si – experience was a complete failure of never been able to get one thing to kick any of the batteries.”   What this means is that the use of nano-Si (synthesized, coated or whatever) cannot yet be (fully) implemented in batteries because of e.g. still showing

[BCONTVentures]

Excellent points IvanVanBeethoven.  Keep in mind that Tekna Powders also abandoned their development and production of nano Silicon powders.   And like you mention IvanVanBeethoven, it is great having a President and CEO (Bernard) having flexibility with the development and production of various initiatives.  The NSiR was definitely not a failure, and a lot of learning

[Mostlyserious]

Thank you IvanVanBeethoven for confirming the accuracy of my fundamental points, even thought the references I provided were sufficient to do so. And thank you BCONT for agreeing with me as well, although it would have been nice if you had stepped in when I was being wrongly accused of lying.  A bit of integrity won't hurt your credibility.