Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum North American Gem Inc V.NAG

TSXV:NAG - Post Discussion

North American Gem Inc > m3 or 3m energy resources
View:
Post by nickelanddime on Feb 17, 2011 10:49pm

m3 or 3m energy resources

Whatever they are called, some workers don't seem happy about them:

https://www.topix.com/forum/city/pineville-ky/TGVNGP7DCNQS09SCP
Comment by actionplanner on Feb 17, 2011 11:08pm
This is not the same miners for Nag, if anyone reads the headlines, it's just a farce, the heading reads "3M Enery Resources" The miner for NAG is 3M EnerGy with a "G"  Geez what some people do to bash ..
Comment by nickelanddime on Feb 17, 2011 11:37pm
You're passing up that whole thread based on a missing G?  Seriously?One reply in that thread mentioned that the company in question is from san diego.  Well, M3 energy (the ones who are associated with NAG) are also from san diego.  Posters were also from the kentucky area. Not a stretch of the imagination to say that they are talking about the very same company NAG is ...more  
Comment by Saturn4 on Feb 18, 2011 12:46am
If this is for real, it really sucks --- usually, however, you have a few pissed off workers talking s.hit because they got fired, disciplined, didn't get work or whatever.  With the price of coal as it is now, I would highly doubt it that M3 (if it is the contractor NAG is using) would not have money to pay its workers.  Sounds fishy to me, actually.   The posts are from ...more  
Comment by nickelanddime on Feb 18, 2011 1:23am
First post is from Friday Jan 21st.That's this year.
Comment by letsbefriends1 on Feb 18, 2011 2:04am
Shouldn't this be the kind of thing we, as shareholders of NAG, should be able to ask IR and get a CLEAR answer? If they know this information and keep feeding us lies, do we have no recourse?Sometimes the people who run this company make me feel a little postal...(legal disclaimer: that's not intended as a threat and should not be construed as me actually intending to step into their ...more  
Comment by Porsche928S4 on Feb 18, 2011 8:54am
If anybody has a chance in their busy day could they possibly give IR a call on this?    At this point there are separate blogs - one for the employee's of M3 and one regarding filing by M3 Energy for bankruptcy.   I'm having very little luck in getting further details on this information but if these blogs are valid NAG has a lot of questions to answer to. 
Comment by giordihead on Feb 18, 2011 8:56am
Yes the first supposed post starts just after the announcement that M3 will start producing mine 2...anyone can start a thread and the timing of this smells of smoething bashful if you know what I mean...
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities