Providence Gold Mines Inc V.PHD

And still

[KozmoT]

nobody seems able to explain where the assay results for Trenches 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 disappeared to?

[Lineminer]

Kozmo Go to the website - and in project details - you can open 'pictures" showing trench locations and coloured grab sample dots! Now go to "news" and look for the Aug 12 "Gold in Stockpile" release - and ta da! There is also a PDF download - both the PR and the PDF have assay results -Providence will have a reference map for each sample - but you can be sure that

[KozmoT]

Nope. Those assay results in Aug 12 NR are still only from Trenches 1, 2 and 8. They curiously omitted to include what trench they were from as they had in the original Mar 2020 NR.  They also changed the Sample numbering scheme in the Mar release for some reason. Sooo, any idea where the missing results are for the other trenches? p.s. if you look at the map in the link below you'll

[catman24]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[KozmoT]

LOL, what you just suggested they are doing is ... illegal.  You might want to think BEFORE you type next time.

[catman24]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[Weeble]

What is illegal?   Come on....how do you get oxygen with your head so far up your a$$?

[KozmoT]

* facepalm * go read what catman wrote - HE (not me) suggested the missing assays were "spectacular" and that management knew this and failed to release the material information while they loaded up on cheap shares.  That's textbook "Insider Trading" You trying to tell me that you can't see what Catman was suggesting is blatantly ... illegal? Seriously?

[KozmoT]

Catman, there is no way you are that stupid so stop pretending.  Withholding material information, good OR bad,  then trading shares of your own company is obviously illegal.  You may want to consider a retraction of your earlier statement...

[Twigler12]

And yet those samples are there, it's public knowledge, nothing they are doing is illegal. The last stock Coombes bought was November 5 and by the looks of it he's been pretty consistently buying shares. Just because it's not in your ideal report you have a hard on for doesn't mean those samples aren't real. Drop the missing samples act  because there is none it's all

[KozmoT]

Can you give us the link to the missing samples? Thanks in Advance.

[Twigler12]

https://www.providencegold.com/project/pictures/ Bozo once again this is your sample survey.... maybe if you ask nicely you can get coombes to dumb it down and spell it out for you. 

[KozmoT]

You're saying they provide variable assay numbers for Trenches 1, 2 and 8 but a picture for Trenches 3, 4, 5, 6 (and 7 appears to be missing)?

[catman24]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[Lineminer]

Hey folks - Catman and others - the "what, what, what" - "where, where where" every crew has one of them - the person of whatever persuasion is on my personal "I " list - Duhh - just a PITA - let's move ahead to positive, realismic, and thoughtful considerations of the facts, waiting for facts - samples analysis take time - a Christmas present PR would be nice

[Weeble]

Kozmo, there are quite a few 10 g/t and a lot of 5 g/t on all of the trenches and the 90 g/t and over 500 g/t hits show that there is a lot of potential.    These are all only samples in shallow trenches.  If you got 90 or 500 hits, it shows they left a lot behind.  It was the early 1900s for crying out loud. We really don't know what we have since all the samples so far