Thermal Energy International Inc V.TMG

Slow train ,but not to .10

[ramman1]

Watch this get ''walked down''  to .20  in a co-ordinated fashion ,THEN:  A large contract announcent in the area of 5 -7 million dollars ,followed the next day with a ''bought deal financing'', at .18

[AlbertESG]

If we follow the same pattern as always, we should see a test of 20 cents in the near future. If we can hold that level and get some good news, then we should rally up to around the 26 - 27 area. This is where the price is likely to stall out and resume the grind back down to the 15 - 18 cent range. If for some reason, we can get a sting of good news, and we push above the 35.5 cent high, we

[ramman1]

It would not surprise me in the least to see  1 or 2 European banks ''knocking on the door'' here  with thier irons  are in the fire , when  looking at TEI's  potential in contracts . European or N/A  does not matter,as banks will lowball  and will ensure thier hands are well in the money for the future contracts via bought deal financings

[panapple42]

Dustin was great in that movie.

[AlbertESG]

It's my view that if a financing is done, it will be for an acquisition, and it will be through Beacon Securities. The main issue now is that it's looking increasingly unlikely that the company will be able to achieve the 35 million in FY25 analyst's target as well as Bill's 30% FY over FY growth target.

[prone]

Your unreliable guess based on no information - wow - Next quarter will show growth due to momentum - based on last year(s)... --->The main issue now is that it's looking increasingly unlikely that the company will be able to achieve the 35 million in FY25 analyst's target as well as Bill's 30% FY over FY growth target. <---

[AlbertESG]

Estimate yes. Unreliable guess, no. It's strange after all these years that you haven't learned how the company's revenue recognition model works. I could give you an outline of my current FY25 estimate, but I imagine it would just be a wasted effort. p.s. panapple - by using an apostrophe s after company, I am indicating possession, as in it belongs to the company. I am not

[panapple42]

of course.  I forgot about the target.  interesting one that.  so timely.

[Mostlyserious]

The main issue continues to be lumpiness.  The 30% advertised growth was never really from year to year, but an average based on a two end points over a longer period of time.  We could have no growth next couple of years, and then the 3rd year they hit $50 million or whatever, and voila, you have an average annual growth in double digits. That's the past. The present is that there

[panapple42]

SP has fallen 30 percent off the high.  TMG on vacation.l

[panapple42]

please share the link to your analyst targets. "analyst's" as in more than 1 analyst. or is it the analyst in your mom's basement;

[Mostlyserious]

To Albert's defence - "analyst's" - one.  Apostrophe before the last "s".  

[panapple42]

agreed.

[panapple42]

so the stock will go down after a record sized contract?   would IR deserve a bonus after that happen or would it just happen naturally?  

[panapple42]

the bonus that is.

[CPA2012]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy