Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

GOLD up $38.00

[TeckPro]

and TUD still being manipulated. EOM!!!!

[Larry60]

Manipulated???? Are you not allowed to put bids in the market????? TUDs actually up a couple of pennies on higher volume than usual, a good sign Why is the failure of TUD always blamed on manipulation??? As Ive mentioned before, TUD lacks any real institutional invesotr base.  Yes, Eric and Walter own 45% or so, but theyre controlling shareholers, and not much they can do in the market

[GuruNN]

I'm really surprised that our Larry here knows what the producers want.   He says he's a small investor but supposedly knows what the big guys want, that's really a ridiculous contrast.    And he's playing the Tudor investor here, when he's clearly controlled by Seabridge.    Keyword Seabridge...   Didn't Fronk promise in

[Larry60]

Of, the Seabridge conspiracy???  Im an agent of Rudy/s??  LMFAO! I wish Rudy luck, as success for SEA will mean success for us with TUD. As for what producers want, anyone who has been investing in this sector for 10 or more years knows what Producers want generally speakin.  If they dont, they should not be investing in junior resource sector.  Its common knowledge and sense

[Larry60]

Gold up $60.  GDXJ up 5% (almost 10% on week). TUD???????????  Bid $0.85.  Wow Good job TUD IR team.

[cskhurasu]

IF SEA is a reasonable parallel, TUD will need to spend at least another $500 million to get to a production decision and that's assuming no inflation. TUD's requirement to raise and spend all the money for 60% of the econmic benefit is a disaster. Why would any major do a deal with TUD under those terms?

[TeckPro]

GOLD UP $53.00 today and they are holding TUD at same price. So for the record this is absolute proof that the Gold price has nothing to do with TUD share price (even though is should move with Gold price), but due to daily manipulation is does not.

[Larry60]

TUD doesnt go up when Gold does so it is a sign of manipulation????? NOPE. Its a sign of a few things: 1)  Not enough buyers in market for TUD, 2)  too many funds who buy the Flow through at an effective big discount to market and then sell once hold comes off.  THese are not long term hold value builders.  We see it every day. 3) If Treaty Creek ever does get built (I hope

[Larry60]

mere couple of weeks ago when Gold was falling and TUD was following, so many pumpers said "hey, until gold bounces we're dead in the water" Gold bounced over $100 this week, and TUD?????????? NO BOUNCE. Why?  Cuz looks like no once cares.  But the resident TUD board self declared  "experts" claims its manipulation..............as they always do.

[Jetstream1281]

I think if this pop is sustained into next week we see some movement on TC SPs

[Jetstream1281]

I would agree that there is not enough instutional investment to allow these stocks to truly follow POG. They do generally follow it but there is definitley some room for games by those who hold large chunks.

[cskhurasu]

Larry60 gets it. No one bothers to manipulate TUD sp because there isn't enough volume to make it worthwhile. Why hasn't TUD moved with the gold price this week? Because another financing is coming to fund more drilling. Because critical information on the economic potential of TC mineralization is not available and won't be until late next year at the earliest. Because the stock is

[TeckPro]

Wow still only 11 likes because every one of your posts are totally inaccurate. How can SEA boast about a JV in Q1 when they have no MTT, and a legally filed objection about a permit extension that was granted under a new 60% majority owner of TC being TUD? As the saying goes SEA is between a rock and a hard place. 2024 is going to be very exciting and positive for TUD shareholders. 

[cskhurasu]

Do you really think TUD can come along 9 years later and object to the SEA tunnel permits that TUD knew existed when TUD got involved in TC and on which SEA based hundreds of million of dollars of spending? Why would the BC government want to expose itself to a lawsuit for billions based on the NPV of a fully permitted KSM? When SEA has said it will move the tunnel route if TUD comes up with an

[GuruNN]

Tudor Gold is the legal successor, so everything you say makes no sense.   But it doesn't matter, we will see what the Ministry will say.    It can't be that long before one of the two parties will or must publish something about this. 

[TeckPro]

As many have said before (but you are so daft) that you just don't understand. It's the renewal of a permit that was granted: 1) After many wasted years by SEA which also include dilly dallying and purchasing other properties shows clearly MTT was not a priority.  2) And under new majority TUD ownership. 3) Years of subsequent drilling at great expense by TUD and much better 2x

[fordster]

Teckpro...all it's going to take is a world at war and all those liberal laws are out the door. There will be bills rescinded and passed to grab the lowest hanging fruit as quick as possible. TC is that lowest hanging fruit...not just Gold, but silver and copper.

[Larry60]

Fordster, TC is anything but low haning fruit low grade, remote, overburden (like a freaking moutnain), early stage ie hundreds of millions to go before production decision, permitting, metalurg.....yadayada. Ive said it before, ill say it again:  TC is a massive option on the price of gold.  $3,000 gold and TC becomes interesting.  Dont kid yourself, Eric also views TC as an out

[Whatamidoing1]

When did Eric say this? What were are grades of gold at the time? Eric hasn't talked a whole lot about Tudor in the last few years has he?

[Larry60]

Youre right, Erics been pretty quiet the last year and change.  He did buy the $1 deals.   Im guessing he'll by the deal that must be coming down the pipe at UNDER $1 (and effective price on FT of around $0.60) But no material gains on grade in any event.  Yes, some slighly higher drill holes, but nothing that will be a game change.  A VOK type discovery could change

[fordster]

He hasn't talked much about any junior PM miner. Put your factoid in proper context. ES is going for Uranium and rare-earths. The gold clock isn't on us right now...nothing to say really...unless you need to dispute a bunch of liars.

[Larry60]

Wow, 81 cent close.  Shameful.  Lucky we have such a huge IR team at TUD.'' Eric is loaded up on golds. He luvs gold.  Its the bane of his existence.  & he luvs TUD as well.  Hes a long term thinker. Last thing he really went balls deep on it nfg.  What a winner!!!! SO yeah, hes diversifying out a little.  Wish I had that luxury!!!  

[Larry60]

Teckpro I hope TUDs arguments in court are way better than the fluff you posted.  Your points would have no impact with a judge eg "new majority owners" - WHO KNEW ABOUT PERMIT!, "drilling on TC" - WHEN THEY KNEW ABOUT PERMIT!, "dilly dallying"?????  Dude, get a grip To me, the tunnel is not a big deal.  It is just a bargaining chip.  TUD has not

[fordster]

You're absolutely wrong Larry. Tud has made Swiss cheese where the MTT is supposed to go. They have not drilled from directly above...nor has Seabridge completed the task. I would expect you to know this stuff... Why is it that you hold off posting for a little bit and then you dominate our BB page with "balanced" (sarcasm noted) with nothing but negative, fearful made up facts that

[Larry60]

So funny when you say Im a short or SEA plant.  Really funny aside from getting hammered on my TUD position. But you got me to look at SEA, at least their presentation.  I've always had an idea of what they have, but wow, was I blown away: - 2 oz Au per share  while TUD has 0.07 oz Au per share (& that will go down as share count increases due to carry interest fundign

[fordster]

Once again, are you a TUD short or have any affiliation with Seabridge...answere the question.

[fordster]

So you're saying, Walter Storm,Eric Sprott and all the others who invested in this simply wasted all their money? Yes indeed...Daft.