Victoria Gold Corp VITFF

RE:RE:Better have given Mr McConnell the $50m

[Whateverrr]

The bottom line from investigations in a year or two, etc will VERY likely show negligence in mutliple categories and of varying degrees.  SO, it was very appropriate to remove John, his team and cut VG as a mine and any involvement in it moving forward.

There is no rush to get it done right starting first as Safety as they are doing, deep analysis of all the wrongs, if a new tremendously improved safe heap leach can be engineered, or not, and it goes from there.

Such a littany of conspriarcies by you long shareholders.  YG< FNNND and others, have not obligation to you being top priority.  So what about the gold in the ground, it will stay there until it can be mined or not.  If gold is going to continue to go up up up then 1 3 or 5 years further down is that much better for your 'parabolic' scenario.  Your flaw was being in this poorly run single asset company.  If you think the former VG gold has to be sold soon because this is a flash in the pan POG of $2600 ranges then you are out of luck and have much bigger issues in your gold minor stock strategy so GL on that one.

We Know you LOVE VG and it's management and everyone else is to blame, haha.

Random77 wrote:

VG would be much faster, much more efficient and would safe dollars for company, shareholders, tax payers, FN and local businesses partners. I cannot comprehend the destruction of all these stakeholders without any benefit, except for hide investigation.

Within months the value of gold in the ground will go up parabolic, 10 fold or even more. Easily PWC could save VG with all the money from selling assets partially. Sadly, there is so much politics involved in this case, I doubt they are friendly.