Comment by
MartialA1 on Jan 05, 2016 2:23pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
werdnapk on Jan 05, 2016 2:40pm
If that's the case, then why hasn't VMS commented on this? I'm pretty sure I didn't miss any news release on the "outcome".
Comment by
werdnapk on Jan 05, 2016 2:46pm
Then why hasn't VMS commented on this? I don't recall missing any news releases on the "outcome".
Comment by
werdnapk on Jan 05, 2016 2:48pm
Double posted by accident and I can't find a delete function. :/
Comment by
wintersun10 on Jan 07, 2016 1:23pm
if the Reed Lake mine starts to lose money, VMS might as well concede the case and give ownership to Dunlop along with the losses..............that will teach them!!!
Comment by
tenacious1 on Jan 07, 2016 7:58pm
What exactly will it teach them? Something that we should have thought about? Or is this all factored into copper prices going from $4.50 to $2.06 in 4 years.
Comment by
axegirl1 on Jan 09, 2016 2:47pm
We are sliding into a global recession,. which will make 2008 seem like a day at the beach. Don't expect Vms to move anytime soon.
Comment by
tigars43 on Jan 09, 2016 7:49pm
totally agree ... especially since MALLOY & CO. sees copper traded as low as $ 1.25 this summer ...! HBM can put the leg on VMS for as little as $ 3 MILLION ... if we subtract debt owed by $ 18 MILLION ... vms to hbm! ... THE END REALLY IS CLOSE ...! CLOSER WE CAN UNDERSTAND THE ...! TERRIBLE...! SIMPLY TERRIBLE...!