TORONTO, Nov. 5, 2013 /CNW/ - Uranium One Inc. ("Uranium One") today
reported quarterly revenue of $220.8 million for Q3 2013, including
joint venture revenue, based on sales of 6.0 million pounds at an
average realized sales price of $37 per pound at an average total cash
cost per pound sold of $16.
Uranium One also announced today an update of the existing mineral
resource and reserve estimates for its operations in Kazakhstan, the
United States, Australia and Tanzania, including new and significantly
increased mineral resource and reserve estimates for its Akbastau and
Karatau uranium mines.
Q3 2013 Highlights
Operational
-
Total attributable production during Q3 2013 was 3.2 million pounds, 5%
higher than total attributable production of 3.1 million pounds during
Q3 2012.
-
The average total cash cost per pound sold was $16 per pound for Q3
2013, compared to $16 per pound for Q3 2012.
Financial
-
Attributable sales volumes for Q3 2013 were 6.0 million pounds sold from
the Corporation's operations and joint ventures compared to 2.9 million
pounds sold during Q3 2012.
-
Revenue was $41.0 million in Q3 2013, compared to $8.5 million in Q3
2012.
-
Joint venture revenue in Q3 2013 was $179.8 million, compared to $134.1
million in Q3 2012.
-
The average realized sales price during Q3 2013 was $37 per pound,
compared to $49 per pound in Q3 2012. The average spot price in Q3 2013
was $35 per pound compared to $49 per pound in Q3 2012.
-
Earnings from mine operations were $10.4 million in Q3 2013, compared to
$5.4 million in Q3 2012.
-
Earnings from mine operations, including earnings from joint ventures,
were $49.6 million in Q3 2013, a 15.7% decrease compared to earnings
from mine operations, including joint ventures, of $58.8 million in Q3
2012.
-
The net losses for Q3 2013 were $63.6 million or $0.07 per share,
compared to net losses of $61.6 million or $0.06 per share for Q3 2012.
-
The adjusted net earnings for Q3 2013 were $30.1 million or $0.03 per
share, compared to adjusted net earnings of $7.3 million or $0.01 per
share for Q3 2012.
-
The Corporation impaired the Honeymoon project due to continuing
difficulties in the production process and issues in attaining design
capacity combined with high mine operation costs. The carrying value of
Honeymoon was therefore written down by $67.8 million.
Corporate
-
On January 13, 2013, the Corporation entered into a definitive agreement
with ARMZ under which the Corporation would be taken private pursuant
to a Plan of Arrangement. On March 7, 2013, the Corporation received
security holder approval for the proposed Plan of Arrangement. The
transaction was completed on October 18, 2013. ARMZ and its affiliates,
which owned 51.4% of the Corporation's outstanding common shares and
under the agreement, acquired all of the remaining publicly held Common
Shares for a cash consideration of CDN$2.86 per share.
-
On August 23, 2013, the Corporation made an offer to the holders of its
Series 1 Ruble Bonds and redeemed RUB 11.8 billion (US$382.5 million)
of the Series 1 Ruble Bonds. The Corporation also issued Series 2 Ruble
Bonds for RUB 12.5 billion (US$380.7 million). There remains RUB 2.5
billion (US$81.0 million) of Series 1 Ruble Bonds in issue. The
Corporation entered into six derivatives in September 2013 to
economically hedge the Series 2 Ruble Bonds.
Outlook
The Corporation's total attributable production guidance for 2013
remains at 12.5 million pounds. Total attributable production for 2014
is expected to be 12.4 million pounds as shown below.
Operation
|
2014 Attributable
Production Estimate (M lbs)
|
Akdala
|
1.8
|
South Inkai
|
3.6
|
Karatau
|
2.6
|
Akbastau
|
2.0
|
Zarechnoye
|
1.1
|
Kharasan
|
0.7
|
Willow Creek
|
0.6
|
Total
|
12.4
|
During 2014, the average cash cost per pound sold is expected to be
approximately $18 per pound.
Operation
|
2014 Average Total Cash Cost
per Pound Sold ($/lb)
|
Akdala
|
$16
|
South Inkai
|
$18
|
Karatau
|
$11
|
Akbastau
|
$13
|
Zarechnoye
|
$26
|
Kharasan
|
$24
|
Willow Creek
|
$28
|
Weighted Average
|
$18
|
The Corporation expects attributable sales to be approximately 12.4
million pounds in 2014.
The Corporation expects to incur attributable capital expenditures in
2014 of $65 million for wellfield development and $8 million for plant
and equipment, totalling $73 million for its assets in Kazakhstan and
the United States.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MINE / PROJECT
|
2014 - ESTIMATED CAPITAL EXPENDITURE IN $ MILLIONS
|
WELLFIELD
DEVELOPMENT
|
PLANT AND
EQUIPMENT
AND OTHER
|
TOTAL
|
|
OWNERSHIP
%
|
TOTAL
|
100%
|
|
ATTRIBUTABLE
|
Kazakhstan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Akdala
|
9
|
2
|
11
|
|
70%
|
8
|
South Inkai
|
27
|
3
|
30
|
|
70%
|
21
|
Karatau
|
22
|
1
|
23
|
|
50%
|
12
|
Akbastau
|
13
|
1
|
14
|
|
50%
|
7
|
Zarechnoye
|
26
|
2
|
28
|
|
49.67%
|
14
|
Kharasan
|
29
|
2
|
31
|
|
30%
|
9
|
SKZ-U
|
-
|
3
|
3
|
|
19%
|
1
|
Subtotal - Kazakhstan
|
127
|
14
|
141
|
|
|
72
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Willow Creek and the Powder River Basin
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
|
100%
|
1
|
Subtotal - United States
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
Total
|
127
|
15
|
142
|
|
|
73
|
In 2014, general and administrative expenses, excluding non-cash items,
are expected to be approximately $32 million and exploration expenses
are expected to be $1 million.
Q3 2013 Operations and Projects
During Q3 2013, Uranium One achieved attributable production of 3.2
million pounds, an increase of 5% over attributable production of 3.1
million pounds for the comparable period in 2012.
Operational results for Uranium One's assets during Q3 2013 were:
Asset
|
Q3 Attributable Production
(lbs U3O8)
|
Q3 Total Cash Costs
(per lb sold U3O8)
|
Akdala
|
419,200
|
$13
|
South Inkai
|
957,700
|
$16
|
Karatau
|
698,200
|
$11
|
Akbastau
|
491,500
|
$12
|
Zarechnoye
|
272,300
|
$29
|
Kharasan
|
153,500
|
$21
|
Willow Creek
|
254,000
|
$24
|
Honeymoon(1)
|
99,300
|
N/A
|
Q3 2013 Financial Review
Revenue was $41.0 million in Q3 2013, compared to $8.5 million in Q3
2012. Joint venture revenue in Q3 2013 was $179.8 million, compared to
$134.1 million in Q3 2012.
Operating expenses per pound sold were $16 for Q3 2013 compared to $16
in Q3 2012.
Earnings from mine operations were $10.4 million in Q3 2013, compared to
$5.4 million in Q3 2012.
Earnings from mine operations, including earnings from joint ventures,
were $49.6 million in Q3 2013, a 15.7% decrease compared to earnings
from mine operations, including joint ventures, of $58.8 million in Q3
2012.
Attributable inventory as at September 30, 2013 was 0.7 million pounds,
which includes work in progress as well as finished product. Finished
product at conversion facilities awaiting pre-scheduled deliveries into
sales contracts was 0.5 million pounds at September 30, 2013.
The net losses for Q3 2013 were $63.6 million or $0.07 per share,
compared to net losses of $61.6 million or $0.06 per share for Q3 2012.
The adjusted net earnings for Q3 2013 were $30.1 million or $0.03 per
share, compared to adjusted net earnings of $7.3 million or $0.01 per
share for Q3 2012.
Consolidated cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash of
$1,932.8 million as at September 30, 2013 compared to $442.0 million at
December 31, 2012. Working capital was $566.7 million at September 30,
2013.
The following table provides a summary of key financial results:
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL
|
Q3 2013
|
Q3 2012
|
YTD
Q3 2013
|
YTD
Q3 2012
|
Attributable production (lbs) (2)
|
3,246,400
|
3,081,300
|
9,733,000
|
8,452,600
|
Attributable sales (lbs) (2)
|
5,970,900
|
2,865,800
|
10,217,300
|
6,558,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average realized sales price ($ per lb) (2)
|
37
|
49
|
40
|
51
|
Average total cash cost per pound sold($ per lb)(2)
|
16
|
16
|
17
|
16
|
Revenues ($millions)(3)(4)
|
41.0
|
8.5
|
58.1
|
26.8
|
Revenues from joint ventures ($millions)
|
179.8
|
134.1
|
348.3
|
308.5
|
Earnings from mine operations ($millions)(3)(4)
|
10.4
|
5.4
|
17.4
|
13.8
|
Earnings from mine operations, including earnings from joint ventures
($millions)
|
49.6
|
58.8
|
100.3
|
148.2
|
Net loss($millions)
|
(63.6)
|
(61.6)
|
(62.5)
|
(27.9)
|
Net loss per share - basic and diluted ($ per share)
|
(0.07)
|
(0.06)
|
(0.07)
|
(0.03)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net earnings($millions)(2)
|
30.1
|
7.3
|
44.5
|
32.1
|
Adjusted net earnings per share - basic ($ per share)(2)
|
0.03
|
0.01
|
0.05
|
0.03
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of adjusted net earnings /
(loss) to the consolidated financial statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(US DOLLARS IN MILLIONS EXCEPT PER
SHARE AMOUNTS)
|
|
3 MONTHS ENDED
|
9 MONTHS ENDED
|
SEP 30, 2013
$ MILLIONS
|
SEP 30, 2012
$ MILLIONS
|
SEP 30, 2013
$ MILLIONS
|
SEP 30, 2012
$ MILLIONS
|
Net loss
|
|
(63.6)
|
(61.6)
|
(62.5)
|
(27.9)
|
Fair value adjustments
|
|
(0.3)
|
-
|
(1.2)
|
0.3
|
Impairment charges (net of deferred taxes)
|
|
67.8
|
79.1
|
67.8
|
79.1
|
Gain on business combination
|
|
-
|
(17.2)
|
-
|
(17.2)
|
Corporate development expenditure
|
|
6.6
|
0.2
|
12.6
|
2.6
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
-
|
1.5
|
2.1
|
1.5
|
2010 Debentures accelerated interest
|
|
17.8
|
-
|
17.8
|
-
|
Ruble bond hedge accounting adjustments
|
|
1.8
|
5.3
|
7.9
|
4.1
|
Non-recurring income tax adjustment
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(10.4)
|
Adjusted net earnings
|
|
30.1
|
7.3
|
44.5
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net earnings per share - basic ($) and
diluted
|
|
0.03
|
0.01
|
0.05
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares (millions) -
basic and diluted
|
|
959.2
|
957.2
|
957.9
|
957.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The financial statements, as well as the accompanying management's
discussion and analysis were prepared in accordance with International
Financial Reporting (IFRS) and are available for review at www.uranium1.com and should be read in conjunction with this news release. Any reference
to information including joint venture balances should be read as a
non-IFRS measure used to compare our financial performance to prior
periods. All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated.
All references to pounds sold or pounds produced are to pounds of U3O8.
Update of Existing Mineral Resource and Reserve Estimates
As at June 30, 2013 the total attributable proven and probable reserves
at the Company's operations in Kazakhstan, the United States, Australia
and Tanzania increased by 139% compared to previous estimates, from
61.005 million lbs U3O8 (23,465 tonnes U) to 145.924 million lbs U3O8 (56,129 tonnes U), while the total attributable measured and indicated
resources increased by 98%, from 111.641 million lbs U3O8 (42,942 tonnes U) to 221.079 million lbs U3O8 (85,038 tonnes U).
The update includes new resource and reserve estimates for Akbastau and
Karatau, showing significant increases in the attributable reserves and
resources at both mines:
-
at Akbastau, the Company's attributable share of proven and probable
reserves increased by 354%, from 9.047 million lbs U3O8 (3,480 t U) to 41.075 million lbs U3O8 (15,799 t U), while the Company's attributable share of measured and
indicated resources increased by 286%, from 15.919 million lbs U3O8 (6,125 t U) to 61.476 million lbs U3O8 (23,647 t U)
-
at Karatau, the Company's attributable share of proven and probable
reserves increased by 674%, from 8.730 million lbs U3O8 (3,358 t U) to 67.543 million lbs U3O8 (25,980 t U), while the Company's attributable share of measured and
indicated resources increased by 586%, from 12.102 million lbs U3O8 (4,661 t U) to 82.984 million lbs U3O8 (31,920 t U)
The new estimates, finalized in late October 2013 following review and
verification by the Company's Qualified Person, result from the
application of 3D modeling techniques to an extensive database of
Kazakh Government drilling information which was made available to the
Company for the first time. The new estimate does not include any
resources for Zarechnoye South as the Company has determined that the
mineral resources on this property are insufficient to support
development.
Further information, including a breakdown of mineral resource and
reserve estimates on a mine by mine basis, is attached as Appendix A to
this news release.
About Uranium One
Uranium One is one of the world's largest uranium producers with a
globally diversified portfolio of assets located in Kazakhstan, the
United States, Australia and Tanzania.
Notes
(1)
|
Honeymoon production represents concentrates in process that require
further processing in order to become uranium concentrates that can be
converted into a saleable product.
|
(2)
|
Attributable production and sales are from assets owned and joint
ventures in commercial production during the period. The Corporation
has included the following non-IFRS performance measures: average
realized sales price per pound, cash cost per pound sold, adjusted net
earnings and adjusted net earnings per share. In the uranium mining
industry, these are common performance measures but do not have any
standardized meaning, and are non-IFRS measures. The Corporation
believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in
accordance with IFRS, the Corporation and certain investors use this
information to evaluate the Corporation's performance and ability to
generate cash flow. The additional information provided herein should
not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of
performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. See "Non-IFRS Measures".
|
(3)
|
Comparative information has been restated with the adoption of IFRS 11 -
Joint arrangements on January 1, 2013.
|
(4)
|
Includes profits / losses for joint venture production delivered into
contracts held by the Corporation, and excludes revenues from joint
ventures.
|
Cautionary Statements
No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority
has approved or disapproved the information contained herein.
Scientific and technical information contained herein has been reviewed
on behalf of the Corporation by Mr. M.H.G. Heyns, Pr.Sci.Nat.
(SACNASP), MSAIMM, MGSSA, Senior Vice President New Business and
Technical Services of the Corporation, a qualified person for the
purposes of NI 43-101.
Investors are advised to refer to independent technical reports
containing detailed information with respect to the material properties
of Uranium One. These technical reports are available under the profile
of Uranium One Inc. at www.sedar.com. Those technical reports provide the date of each resource or reserve
estimate, details of the key assumptions, methods and parameters used
in the estimates, details of quantity and grade or quality of each
resource or reserve and a general discussion of the extent to which the
estimate may be materially affected by any known environmental,
permitting, legal, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other
relevant issues. The technical reports also provide information with
respect to data verification in the estimation.
Forward-looking statements: This news release contains certain
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include but are
not limited to those with respect to the price of uranium, the
estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves, the realization
of mineral reserve estimates, the timing and amount of estimated future
production, costs of production, capital expenditures, costs and timing
of the development of new deposits, success of exploration activities,
permitting time lines, currency fluctuations, requirements for
additional capital, government regulation of mining operations,
environmental risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses, the timing and
potential effects of proposed transactions, title disputes or claims,
limitations on insurance coverage, and the timing and possible outcome
of pending litigation. In certain cases, forward-looking statements can
be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "expects" or "does
not expect", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates",
"forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate", or
"believes" or variations of such words and phrases, or state that
certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or
"will" be taken, occur or be achieved. Forward-looking statements
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which
may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Uranium
One to be materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, the completion of
the transactions described in this press release, the future steady
state production and cash costs of Uranium One, the actual results of
current exploration activities, conclusions of economic evaluations,
changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, possible
variations in grade and ore densities or recovery rates, failure of
plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated, accidents,
labour disputes or other risks of the mining industry, delays in
obtaining government approvals or financing or in completion of
development or construction activities, risks relating to the
integration of acquisitions and the realization of synergies relating
thereto, to international operations, to prices of uranium as well as
those factors referred to in the section entitled "Risk Factors" in
Uranium One's Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31,
2012, which is available under Uranium One's profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, and which should be reviewed in conjunction with this document.
Although Uranium One has attempted to identify important factors that
could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from
those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other
factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated,
estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking
statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future
events could differ materially from those anticipated in such
statements.
Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements. Uranium One expressly disclaims any intention or obligation
to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise, except in accordance
with applicable securities laws.
For further information about Uranium One, please visit www.uranium1.com.
For further information:
Chris Sattler
Chief Executive Officer
Tel: +1 647 788 8500
Anton Jivov
Vice President, Corporate Affairs
Tel: +1 647 788 8461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APPENDIX A
URANIUM ONE INC.
SUMMARY OF MINERAL RESOURCES AND MINERAL RESERVES
AT JUNE 30, 2013
|
Mine / Area
(Attributable %)
Location
Type of Mine
|
Category
|
Tonnes
|
Grade
|
Uranium
|
Grade
|
Uranium
|
|
|
(000s)
|
(%U)
|
(t U)
|
(% U3O8)
|
(M lbs U3O8)
|
100%
|
Attributable
|
100%
|
Attributable
|
Akbastau No 1
(50%)
Kazakhstan
ISL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured
|
20,090
|
0.081
|
16,278
|
8,139
|
0.096
|
42.32
|
21.16
|
Indicated
|
3,044
|
0.124
|
3,764
|
1,882
|
0.146
|
9.79
|
4.89
|
Measured &
Indicated
|
23,134
|
0.087
|
20,042
|
10,021
|
0.102
|
52.11
|
26.05
|
Inferred
|
18,118
|
0.068
|
12,405
|
6,203
|
0.081
|
32.25
|
16.13
|
Proven
|
33,233
|
0.042
|
13,881
|
6,940
|
0.049
|
36.09
|
18.04
|
Probable
|
5,479
|
0.056
|
3,049
|
1,524
|
0.066
|
7.93
|
3.96
|
Proven &
Probable
|
38,712
|
0.044
|
16,930
|
8,464
|
0.052
|
44.02
|
22.00
|
Akbastau No 3
(50%)
Kazakhstan
ISL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured
|
12,247
|
0.076
|
9,270
|
4,635
|
0.089
|
24.10
|
12.05
|
Indicated
|
8,928
|
0.100
|
8,945
|
4,473
|
0.118
|
23.26
|
11.63
|
Measured &
Indicated
|
21,175
|
0.086
|
18,215
|
9,108
|
0.101
|
47.36
|
23.68
|
Inferred
|
1,023
|
0.120
|
1,226
|
613
|
0.141
|
3.19
|
1.59
|
Proven
|
21,393
|
0.035
|
7,423
|
3,712
|
0.041
|
19.30
|
9.65
|
Probable
|
16,071
|
0.045
|
7,245
|
3,622
|
0.053
|
18.84
|
9.42
|
Proven &
Probable
|
37,464
|
0.039
|
14,668
|
7,334
|
0.046
|
38.14
|
19.07
|
Akbastau No 4
(50%)
Kazakhstan
ISL
|
Measured
|
5,912
|
0.110
|
6,497
|
3,249
|
0.130
|
16.89
|
8.45
|
Indicated
|
2,616
|
0.097
|
2,539
|
1,270
|
0.114
|
6.60
|
3.30
|
Measured &
Indicated
|
8,528
|
0.106
|
9,036
|
4,519
|
0.125
|
23.49
|
11.75
|
Inferred
|
13,807
|
0.125
|
17,221
|
8,611
|
0.147
|
44.77
|
22.39
|
Proven
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Probable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Proven &
Probable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Karatau (50%)
Kazakhstan
ISL
|
Measured
|
35,328
|
0.058
|
20,602
|
10,301
|
0.069
|
53.56
|
26.78
|
Indicated
|
51,189
|
0.084
|
43,237
|
21,619
|
0.100
|
112.41
|
56.20
|
Measured &
Indicated
|
86,517
|
0.074
|
63,839
|
31,920
|
0.087
|
165.97
|
82.98
|
Inferred
|
65,953
|
0.095
|
62,772
|
31,386
|
0.112
|
163.19
|
81.60
|
Proven
|
57,248
|
0.030
|
16,939
|
8,469
|
0.035
|
44.04
|
22.02
|
Probable
|
92,140
|
0.038
|
35,022
|
17,511
|
0.045
|
91.05
|
45.52
|
Proven &
Probable
|
149,388
|
0.035
|
51,960
|
25,980
|
0.041
|
135.09
|
67.54
|
Akdala - Blizhniy
(70%)
Kazakhstan
ISL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured
|
33,935
|
0.006
|
1,887
|
1,321
|
0.007
|
4.90
|
3.43
|
Indicated
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Measured &
Indicated
|
33,935
|
0.006
|
1,887
|
1,321
|
0.007
|
4.90
|
3.43
|
Inferred
|
911
|
0.046
|
415
|
291
|
0.054
|
1.08
|
0.76
|
Proven
|
33,935
|
0.005
|
1,698
|
1,189
|
0.006
|
4.41
|
3.09
|
Probable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Proven &
Probable
|
33,935
|
0.005
|
1,698
|
1,189
|
0.006
|
4.41
|
3.09
|
Akdala - Letniy
(70%)
Kazakhstan
ISL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Indicated
|
628
|
0.064
|
399
|
279
|
0.075
|
1.04
|
0.73
|
Measured &
Indicated
|
628
|
0.064
|
399
|
279
|
0.075
|
1.04
|
0.73
|
Inferred
|
8,772
|
0.064
|
5,600
|
3,920
|
0.075
|
14.56
|
10.19
|
Proven
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Probable
|
1,300
|
0.028
|
360
|
252
|
0.033
|
0.94
|
0.66
|
Proven &
Probable
|
1,300
|
0.028
|
360
|
252
|
0.033
|
0.94
|
0.66
|
South Inkai
(70%)
Kazakhstan
ISL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured
|
36,626
|
0.015
|
5,325
|
3,728
|
0.017
|
13.84
|
9.69
|
Indicated
|
625
|
0.051
|
316
|
221
|
0.060
|
0.82
|
0.58
|
Measured &
Indicated
|
37,251
|
0.015
|
5,641
|
3,949
|
0.018
|
14.66
|
10.27
|
Inferred
|
42,845
|
0.040
|
17,099
|
11,969
|
0.047
|
44.45
|
31.12
|
Proven
|
51,276
|
0.009
|
4,793
|
3,355
|
0.011
|
12.46
|
8.72
|
Probable
|
876
|
0.032
|
284
|
199
|
0.038
|
0.74
|
0.52
|
Proven &
Probable
|
52,152
|
0.010
|
5,077
|
3,554
|
0.011
|
13.20
|
9.24
|
Zarechnoye
(49.67%)
Kazakhstan
ISL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured
|
16,786
|
0.008
|
1,289
|
640
|
0.009
|
3.35
|
1.66
|
Indicated
|
11,752
|
0.057
|
6,699
|
3,327
|
0.067
|
17.42
|
8.65
|
Measured &
Indicated
|
28,538
|
0.028
|
7,988
|
3,967
|
0.033
|
20.77
|
10.31
|
Inferred
|
9,400
|
0.048
|
4,500
|
2,235
|
0.056
|
11.70
|
5.81
|
Proven
|
33,600
|
0.003
|
1,030
|
512
|
0.004
|
2.68
|
1.33
|
Probable
|
15,300
|
0.023
|
3,480
|
1,729
|
0.027
|
9.05
|
4.49
|
Proven &
Probable
|
48,900
|
0.009
|
4,510
|
2,240
|
0.011
|
11.73
|
5.82
|
Kharasan
(30%)
Kazakhstan
ISL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured
|
6,975
|
0.027
|
1,884
|
565
|
0.032
|
4.90
|
1.47
|
Indicated
|
8,581
|
0.078
|
6,677
|
2,003
|
0.092
|
17.36
|
5.21
|
Measured &
Indicated
|
15,556
|
0.055
|
8,561
|
2,568
|
0.065
|
22.26
|
6.68
|
Inferred
|
17,600
|
0.102
|
17,940
|
5,382
|
0.120
|
46.64
|
13.99
|
Proven
|
13,951
|
0.008
|
1,123
|
337
|
0.009
|
2.92
|
0.88
|
Probable
|
17,162
|
0.035
|
6,009
|
1,803
|
0.041
|
15.62
|
4.69
|
Proven &
Probable
|
31,113
|
0.023
|
7,132
|
2,140
|
0.027
|
18.54
|
5.57
|
Willow Creek
(100%)
U.S.A.
ISL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Indicated
|
9,843
|
0.066
|
6,512
|
6,512
|
0.078
|
16.93
|
16.93
|
Measured &
Indicated
|
9,843
|
0.066
|
6,512
|
6,512
|
0.078
|
16.93
|
16.93
|
Inferred
|
94
|
0.058
|
54
|
54
|
0.068
|
0.14
|
0.14
|
Proven
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Probable
|
6,494
|
0.043
|
2,762
|
2,762
|
0.050
|
7.18
|
7.18
|
Proven &
Probable
|
6,494
|
0.043
|
2,762
|
2,762
|
0.050
|
7.18
|
7.18
|
Honeymoon
(100%)
Australia
ISL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Indicated
|
4,192
|
0.100
|
4,208
|
4,208
|
0.118
|
10.94
|
10.94
|
Measured &
Indicated
|
4,192
|
0.100
|
4,208
|
4,208
|
0.118
|
10.94
|
10.94
|
Inferred
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Proven
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Probable
|
3,640
|
0.061
|
2,213
|
2,213
|
0.072
|
5.75
|
5.75
|
Proven &
Probable
|
3,640
|
0.061
|
2,213
|
2,213
|
0.072
|
5.75
|
5.75
|
Mkuju River
(13.9%)
Tanzania
Conventional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured
|
113,923
|
0.028
|
31,579
|
4,393
|
0.033
|
82.10
|
11.42
|
Indicated
|
72,922
|
0.022
|
16,348
|
2,274
|
0.026
|
42.50
|
5.91
|
Measured &
Indicated
|
186,845
|
0.026
|
47,927
|
6,667
|
0.030
|
124.60
|
17.33
|
Inferred
|
54,549
|
0.019
|
10,562
|
1,469
|
0.023
|
27.46
|
3.82
|
Proven
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Probable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Proven &
Probable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured
|
281,822
|
0.034
|
94,611
|
36,970
|
0.040
|
245.97
|
96.11
|
Indicated
|
174,321
|
0.057
|
99,644
|
48,067
|
0.067
|
259.05
|
124.96
|
Measured &
Indicated
|
456,143
|
0.043
|
194,255
|
85,038
|
0.050
|
505.02
|
221.08
|
Inferred
|
233,072
|
0.064
|
149,794
|
72,132
|
0.076
|
389.43
|
187.53
|
Proven
|
244,636
|
0.019
|
46,886
|
24,513
|
0.023
|
121.89
|
63.73
|
Probable
|
158,462
|
0.038
|
60,426
|
31,616
|
0.045
|
157.09
|
82.19
|
Proven &
Probable
|
403,098
|
0.027
|
107,312
|
56,129
|
0.031
|
278.99
|
145.92
|
Notes:
|
|
(1)
|
Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated
economic viability. Inferred Mineral Resources have a great amount of
uncertainty as to their existence and as to their economic
feasibility. Under no circumstances can it be assumed that all or any
part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will ever be upgraded to a higher
Mineral Resource category or converted to Mineral Reserves.
|
(2)
|
All Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves are reported in accordance
with the definitions and guidelines for the reporting of exploration
information, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves determined by the
Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Definition
Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted by the CIM
Council (the "CIM Standards") and National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral
Projects promulgated by the Canadian Securities Administrators ("NI 43-101"). Unless otherwise stated, for each project the Mineral Reserves
stated above are included in the total estimate of Mineral Resources as
stated above. All figures are rounded to reflect appropriate levels of
confidence. Columns may not add up correctly due to rounding.
|
(3)
|
The above estimates are reported both on a 100% basis and on the basis
of the portion of total Mineral Reserves and/or Mineral Resources
notionally attributable to Uranium One's equity interests in Mkuju
River Project, and the joint ventures through which the mines in
Kazakhstan are owned. Uranium One's interests in the above mines and
projects are as follows: Akdala (70%), South Inkai (70%), Karatau
(50%), Akbastau (50%), Zarechnoye (49.67%), Kharasan (30%), Willow
Creek (100%), Honeymoon (100%), and Mkuju River (13.9%).
|
|
|
Resource and Reserve Estimation Methodology
In July 2013, Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. ("RPA") was engaged by Uranium One to undertake a review of existing mineral
resource and reserve estimates for the Company's operations in
Kazakhstan, the United States, Australia and Tanzania (other than
Akbastau and Karatau, in respect of which new estimates prepared for
the Company by CSA Global Pty Ltd. ("CSA") were considered) and to deplete those estimates for production based
on production figures as at June 30, 2013. The final draft report was
delivered to the Company on September 30, 2013; the process of review
and verification of the draft report was completed by the Company's
Qualified Person in late October 2013.
Depletion Methodology
Reserve estimates include dilution, an estimate for extraction, and are
stated as "delivered to the plant". Mining depletion has in all cases
been based on production data provided by Uranium One as at June 30,
2013. Resources were depleted on the basis of tonnes of uranium
extracted divided by the planned extraction. Where production to date
has exceeded the resource estimate for a given production block, the
block was only depleted to the extent of the pre-existing resource
estimate and any additional production was considered to be "production
in addition to the resource/reserve estimate".
In some cases, depleted resource estimates were generated from the
remaining reserve estimates, as the level of review did not include the
re-estimation of resources where measured and indicated resources had
been converted to reserves. In cases where the changes could not be
readily identified, RPA first depleted measured and then indicated
resources. In support of its reserve estimate for each property, RPA
also reviewed production to date and the performance of the leach
fields at the operations, in terms of extraction versus time and
extraction versus pore volume exchanges.
Mineral Resource and Reserve Estimates for Akbastau and Karatau
CSA was engaged by Uranium One in November 2012 to prepare new resource
and reserve estimates for Akbastau and Karatau following the provision
by the Government of Kazakhstan for the first time of an extensive
database of previously unavailable drilling data. Previously, estimates
for the Company's mines in Kazakhstan were prepared in accordance with
the Russian resource classification system (using a 2D polygonal
geological modeling and estimation process) and then converted to the
CIM resource classification system. Direct access to the raw drilling
data enabled the preparation for the first time of resource and reserve
estimates at Akbastau and Karatau using the application of
internationally recognized and more exhaustive 3D modeling techniques.
The resource estimates for Akbastau and Karatau were prepared by CSA and
reviewed by RPA, and RPA also prepared the reserve estimates under
contract to CSA starting in July 2013. RPA used CSA's Akbastau and
Karatau resource block models to prepare the reserve estimates. CSA
re-estimated the global mineral resources for both deposits, using new
wireframe models and interpolation of grades into block models based on
the existing drilling data collected to date. RPA applied a 90%
extraction rate, the same rate as used in previous estimates, because
it is supported by the extraction curves from the site. In addition,
RPA deducted a further 10% of the resources outside of the
technological blocks to account for thin zones and other potential
losses. RPA recommends further review of the resource model and the
location of potential surface interference to better define this
value. Where production from the technological blocks exceeded the
planned extraction of 90%, RPA depleted the resource and reserve rock
tonnages and uranium tonnage from the total estimate and considered any
additional production to be "production in addition to the
resource/reserve estimate".
The updated reserve estimates for Akbastau and Karatau are based on a
cut-off of 0.01% U, 4 m thickness, and using an average long-term
uranium price of US$65 per pound U3O8 (US$169/kg U).
RPA did not convert any of the resources at the Akbastau No. 4 deposit
to reserves as the mining in this area is at the test production stage.
Qualified Persons
Except as otherwise noted, Mr. M.H.G. Heyns, Pr.Sci.Nat. (SACNASP),
MSAIMM, MGSSA, CIM, Senior Vice-President of Uranium One, is the
Qualified Person who prepared or supervised the preparation of the
information that forms the basis of the scientific and technical
disclosure on the Company's mineral properties contained in this press
release, and all of the estimates set out herein, with the exception of
those relating to the Mkuju River Project, have been reviewed by Roscoe
Postle Associates Inc. under the supervision of its Qualified Person,
Mr. Dennis Bergen, P. Eng., Associate Principal Mining Engineer. The
resource estimates for the Karatau and Akbastau mines were prepared for
the Company by independent consultants CSA Global Pty Ltd., under the
supervision of its Qualified Person, Dr. Maxim Seredkin, Senior
Resource Geologist, and the reserve estimates were prepared by RPA,
under the supervision of its Qualified Person, Mr. Denis Bergen.
SOURCE Uranium One Inc.