http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3150/2346669473_8e76c0fc98.jpg?v=0

PlanetaryWorks
_____________


Of Note:

For those who recall Eliot Spitzer


Eliot Spitzer
Eliot Spitzer

54th Governor of New York
In office
January 1, 2007 – March 17, 2008
Lieutenant David Paterson
Preceded by George Pataki
Succeeded by David Paterson

Just over a year ago, in February of 2008, then New York Governor Eliot Spitzer, in one of his last acts as Governor of New York, warned about the impending crisis created by predatory lending and revealed that the Bush Administration was blocking efforts to deal with it.

(The prostitution story that followed was timely and career ending. But the story does not end with Spitzer.)

___________________________________________________


From the article in the Washington Post by Eliot Spitzer

Several years ago, state attorneys general and others involved in consumer protection began to notice a marked increase in a range of predatory lending practices by mortgage lenders.

In addition, the widespread nature of these practices, if left unchecked, threatened our financial markets.

Even though predatory lending was becoming a national problem, the Bush administration looked the other way and did nothing to protect American homeowners. In fact, the government chose instead to align itself with the banks that were victimizing consumers.

What did the Bush administration do in response?

Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to protect consumers, it embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented campaign to prevent states from protecting their residents from the very problems to which the federal government was turning a blind eye.

The OCC also promulgated new rules that prevented states from enforcing any of their own consumer protection laws against national banks.


But the unanimous opposition of the 50 states did not deter, or even slow, the Bush administration in its goal of protecting the banks.

The OCC filed a federal lawsuit to stop the investigation.

When history tells the story of the subprime lending crisis and recounts its devastating effects on the lives of so many innocent homeowners, the Bush administration will not be judged favorably.

... it will be judged as a willing accomplice to the lenders who went to any lengths in their quest for profits. So willing, in fact, that it used the power of the federal government in an unprecedented assault on state legislatures, as well as on state attorneys general and anyone else on the side of consumers.  
___________________________________________________

It was on February 14, 2008, that Spitzer's oped went on the Washington Post website and the federal agents staked out his Washington, D.C. Mayflower Hotel Room 222.

On March 10th the New York Times broke the story of Spitzer's encounter with a prostitute.

Emperors Club VIP was an international escort agency based in New York City, founded in 2004 and operated from the bank accounts of QAT Consulting Group, Inc., and QAT International, Inc. The agency was shut down in March 2008 after a federal investigation into suspicious money transfers from New York Governor Eliot Spitzer led to the discovery of its operation as an illegal prostitution ring. Following public reports Spitzer's patronage as client #9, he resigned from office.

___________________________________________________

“In light of the revelations about Governor Eliot Spitzer’s use of prostitutes, we are reminded again that the Senate Ethics Committee has so far refused to investigate Senator David Vitter (R-LA), who admitted to using the services of the so-called D.C. Madam to solicit for prostitution. Although Governor Spitzer’s conduct is more serious — likely amounting to one or more felonies — both men are high level government officials who have publicly proclaimed their high moral standards. Both should have to live by those standards and beheld accountable for their actions. The Ethics Committee should not continue to give Senator Vitter a pass.”

http://bigheaddc.com/category/deborah-jeane-palfrey/


___________________________________________________

Deborah Jeane Palfrey (March 18, 1956 – May 1, 2008) (dubbed the D.C. Madam by the news media) operated Pamela Martin and Associates, an escort agency in Washington, D.C. Although she argued that the company's services were legal, she was convicted on April 15, 2008 of racketeering, using the mail for illegal purposes, and money laundering. Slightly over two weeks later, facing a prison sentence of five or six years, she was found hanged. Autopsy results and the final police investigative report concluded it was death by suicide.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a8/Deborah_Jeane_Palfrey.jpg
Deborah_Jeane_Palfrey.jpg?

___________________________________________________

Judge Orders Lid On Phone Records

Release Likened to Witness Intimidation

By Carol D. Leonnig
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, May 11, 2007; Page B03

Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the woman accused of being the D.C. madam, can't release any more phone records that would reveal patrons of her Washington escort service, a federal judge said yesterday.

U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler placed a temporary restraining order on Palfrey and her civil attorney, prohibiting them from sharing additional phone records with news organizations or the public.

....

Rest of this story can been seen at

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/10/AR2007051001450.html

________________________________________________________________________

A YouTube Video is at the end of this post re: the death of the D.C. madam

The Murder of the DC Madam


If this video does not work on this page it can be view at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St3gLiynu14


____________________________________________________________________________________________


TODAY'S NEWSPAPER
Subscribe | PostPoints

Predatory Lenders' Partner in Crime

How the Bush Administration Stopped the States From Stepping In to Help Consumers


Discussion Policy
CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Eliot Spitzer
Thursday, February 14, 2008; Page A25

Several years ago, state attorneys general and others involved in consumer protection began to notice a marked increase in a range of predatory lending practices by mortgage lenders. Some were misrepresenting the terms of loans, making loans without regard to consumers' ability to repay, making loans with deceptive "teaser" rates that later ballooned astronomically, packing loans with undisclosed charges and fees, or even paying illegal kickbacks. These and other practices, we noticed, were having a devastating effect on home buyers. In addition, the widespread nature of these practices, if left unchecked, threatened our financial markets.

Even though predatory lending was becoming a national problem, the Bush administration looked the other way and did nothing to protect American homeowners. In fact, the government chose instead to align itself with the banks that were victimizing consumers.

Predatory lending was widely understood to present a looming national crisis. This threat was so clear that as New York attorney general, I joined with colleagues in the other 49 states in attempting to fill the void left by the federal government. Individually, and together, state attorneys general of both parties brought litigation or entered into settlements with many subprime lenders that were engaged in predatory lending practices. Several state legislatures, including New York's, enacted laws aimed at curbing such practices.

ad_icon

What did the Bush administration do in response? Did it reverse course and decide to take action to halt this burgeoning scourge? As Americans are now painfully aware, with hundreds of thousands of homeowners facing foreclosure and our markets reeling, the answer is a resounding no.

Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to protect consumers, it embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented campaign to prevent states from protecting their residents from the very problems to which the federal government was turning a blind eye.

Let me explain: The administration accomplished this feat through an obscure federal agency called the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). The OCC has been in existence since the Civil War. Its mission is to ensure the fiscal soundness of national banks. For 140 years, the OCC examined the books of national banks to make sure they were balanced, an important but uncontroversial function. But a few years ago, for the first time in its history, the OCC was used as a tool against consumers.

In 2003, during the height of the predatory lending crisis, the OCC invoked a clause from the 1863 National Bank Act to issue formal opinions preempting all state predatory lending laws, thereby rendering them inoperative. The OCC also promulgated new rules that prevented states from enforcing any of their own consumer protection laws against national banks. The federal government's actions were so egregious and so unprecedented that all 50 state attorneys general, and all 50 state banking superintendents, actively fought the new rules.

But the unanimous opposition of the 50 states did not deter, or even slow, the Bush administration in its goal of protecting the banks. In fact, when my office opened an investigation of possible discrimination in mortgage lending by a number of banks, the OCC filed a federal lawsuit to stop the investigation.

Throughout our battles with the OCC and the banks, the mantra of the banks and their defenders was that efforts to curb predatory lending would deny access to credit to the very consumers the states were trying to protect. But the curbs we sought on predatory and unfair lending would have in no way jeopardized access to the legitimate credit market for appropriately priced loans. Instead, they would have stopped the scourge of predatory lending practices that have resulted in countless thousands of consumers losing their homes and put our economy in a precarious position.

When history tells the story of the subprime lending crisis and recounts its devastating effects on the lives of so many innocent homeowners, the Bush administration will not be judged favorably. The tale is still unfolding, but when the dust settles, it will be judged as a willing accomplice to the lenders who went to any lengths in their quest for profits. So willing, in fact, that it used the power of the federal government in an unprecedented assault on state legislatures, as well as on state attorneys general and anyone else on the side of consumers.

The writer is governor of New York.


© 2008 The Washington Post Company
ad_iconYour Ad Here
ad_icon
Click here!
News | Politics | Opinions | Local | Sports | Arts & Living | Going Out Guide
Jobs | Cars | Real Estate | Rentals | Shopping