Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Court negligence ruling against BP (BP) could cost another $18 bil, stocks fall

Canadian Press, The Canadian Press
0 Comments| September 4, 2014

{{labelSign}}  Favorites
{{errorMessage}}

NEW YORK _ A judge's ruling in the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill case that could cost BP an additional $17.6 billion in fines sent the company's shares tumbling Thursday.

BP (NYSE: BP, Stock Forum) was found by U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier to have acted with ``gross negligence,'' leading to the worst U.S. offshore oil spill. The ruling triggers the highest possible fines under the Clean Air Act of $4,300 per barrel of oil spilled.

The number of barrels spilled is being debated but is likely to fall between 2.4 million and 4.1 million barrels. That translates to a fine of between $10.3 billion and $17.6 billion.

While BP has already spent at least $24 billion in spill-related expenses to date, including cleanup costs and payments to affected businesses and residents, it had set aside just $3.5 billion to cover what it thought would be a much smaller fine for actually spilling the oil.

BP shares fell $2.33, or 4.9 per cent, to $45.38 in afternoon trading, reducing the company's market value by $7 billion. The shares were near $60 per share just prior to the April 2010 spill.

Bruce Huber, associate professor of law at the University of Notre Dame, who specializes in environmental, natural resources and energy law said investors had already assumed BP would pay a bigger fine than the company hoped it would face.

That protected BP's shares from falling even further, Huber said.

Analysts at Jefferies, for example, estimated fines of $10 billion. Raymond James analysts estimated fines of $8 billion.

Still, investors have a few new concerns based on Thursday's ruling: The prospect of an additional big outflow of cash, and not knowing how or when the fine will be finalized or paid.

BP said it would appeal the ruling, a process that puts off a final decision on the size of the fine and also likely delay other pending court cases concerning the spill.

``It's pretty severe,'' said Justin Jenkins, an analyst at Raymond James, about the ruling. ``And now there are even more unknowns about what the final number will be.''

BP sold $38 billion in assets, including refineries and interests in oil and natural gas fields, to fund its initial oil spill expenses and it is in the midst of a program to sell another $10 billion worth of assets by next year.

The new fines may require yet more asset sales, analysts said, though BP could also begin reserving money for the fine even as it appeals the decision. The company remains very profitable. Last year BP earned $24 billion on sales of $379 billion.

Two of BP's partners in the drilling project, they Swiss-based drilling rig owner Transocean Ltd. and Houston-based cement contractor Halliburton were also found to have some responsibility for the disaster. But BP _ and its shareholders _ who bore the brunt of the decision.

Transocean shares fell 23 cents to $37.82 Thursday afternoon. Halliburton shares fell 24 cents to $67.34.

Jonathan Fahey can be reached at https://twitter.com/JonathanFahey .



{{labelSign}}  Favorites
{{errorMessage}}

Get the latest news and updates from Stockhouse on social media

Follow STOCKHOUSE Today

Featured Company