August 14, 2008
Around the World, Pessimism About the Economy
By DAVID JOLLY
More signs of the economic slowdown appeared Wednesday in Asia andEurope.
In Europe, the Bank of England offered a pessimistic outlook for therest of the year, saying that it expected inflation to hit 5 percentbecause of energy and food pricesand the economy to stagnate. And in Asia, Japan appears to be flirtingwith a recession, government data showed Wednesday.
“The numbers were awful,” Hideo Kumano, chief economist at Dai-ichiLife Research Institute in Tokyo, said after the Japanese governmentreported that the grossdomestic productshrank at an annual 2.4 percent rate in the three months that endedJune 30. “Things are going to be very tough in the second half of theyear.”
Even as commodity prices are beginning to ease, the credit andhousing crises in the United States, coupled with the highest inflationin a generation, are weighing on consumers.
In Europe, where new figures on the overall economy are to bereleased on Thursday, analysts are expecting more bad news as well.
“It may still just be summer, but there is a feeling of chill in theeconomic air,” Mervyn King, the governor of the Bank of England, saidWednesday after the central bank issued its pessimistic outlook. Hesaid the British economy was going through “a difficult and painfuladjustment.”
The euro zone, which six months ago appeared to be sailing clear ofAmerica’s problems, now appears to have been ensnared. A poll ofeconomists by Reuters predicted that the new reports would show thatthe region’s economy fell 0.2 percent in the second quarter comparedwith the previous quarter. First-quarter growth was 0.7 percent.
As for Japan, Mr. Kumano said the most serious threat came from asharp decline in personal income, which fell 4 percent. He said he nowexpected growth in the fiscal year, which runs through next March, tobe 0.6 percent at best, down from a previous forecast of 1.2 percent.
The rest of Asia, including China, will not be immune to theslowdown in the major economies, he said.
The InternationalMonetary Fund,which considers growth of 3 percent or less in the world’s grossdomestic product to be a recession, estimated July 17 that the globaleconomy would grow 4.1 percent in 2008 and 3.9 percent in 2009, slowingfrom 4.5 percent growth in the first quarter of 2008. But many privatesector economists say those forecasts look overly optimistic.
“It’s a race against time” whether the global economy ends up in arecession, Gilles Moëc, an economist at Bank of Americain London, said. “Japan and Europe had been seen as protected from theU.S. slowdown. Strangely enough, it seems that Europe and Japan arepaying the price now.”
He said unlike in the United States, where the Federal Reserve hassharply cut interest rates since the start of the credit crisis, to 2percent from 5.25 percent, the policy response among other centralbanks might not have been aggressive enough to support growth.
The Bank of Japan, which has not raised its main rate target above0.5 percent since 1995, has “exhausted its room to maneuver,” he said,while the Bank of England and the European Central Bank,with key rates at 5 percent and 4.25 percent, respectively, have chosento focus on inflation rather than faltering growth.
There are some positive signs. Mr. Moëc said the recent decline inthe price of oil and other commodities provided grounds for hope thatthings would begin picking up by the end of the year. But oil pricesrose more than $2 a barrel on Wednesday after falling to about $113 onTuesday, down from a peak above $147 a barrel last month.
If prices for oil and other commodities fall, companies may remainconfident enough about the outlook to avoid serious cuts in payrolls,and the worst will be avoided in the major economies, Mr. Moëc said.
The I.M.F. made its forecast in July when oil prices were at theirpeak, Mr. Moëc said, noting that Bank of America’s own forecasts calledfor 2008 growth of 3.2 percent and 2009 growth of 3 percent.
“Everything depends on oil,” Mr. Moëc added.
The United States remains a question mark. The American economygrew at a 1.9 percent annualized rate in the second quarter, adisappointing performance considering the billions of dollars ofgovernment stimulus checksthat went out to consumers during the period.
“We don’t really see an upturn yet,” the chief executive of General Motors,Rick Wagoner,said Wednesday during an interview in Bangkok, adding: “To be honest,the way the market has run in the last couple of months, I think it’sfar better to be conservative than to be surprised.”
In Tokyo, officials were optimistic, despite Wednesday’s data. Theeconomics minister, Kaoru Yosano, said the weakness resulted mainlyfrom external factors like high oil prices, but said the economy wouldbounce back.
“Even though the economy contracted in April-June, it would be moreaccurate to think that it won’t last long,” Reuters quoted him assaying.
Japan’s real G.D.P. fell 0.6 percent in the latest quarter comparedwith the first three months of 2008, the biggest decline since 2001.And unlike many Western banks, Japanese lenders appear to be inrelatively solid shape after a decade of restructuring, and a worseningeconomy may not weigh heavily on their balance sheets.
The slowdown is real enough for consumers.
“I lost three clients in June,” said Kozo Kimura, 40, a personaltrainer in Tokyo. “I’m at the end of the food chain and am easy todispose of.”
Martin Foster and Thomas Fuller contributed reporting.
THE PIGS AMERICAN MARKET NEWS OF THEDAY........
How Taxpayer Money Is Wrapped Up inGeorgian War
By Sharona Coutts, ProPublica
Posted on August 14, 2008, Printed on August 14, 2008
http://www.alternet.org/story/95083/
Russia's announcementTuesday morning that it will cease its offensive in Georgia has createda potential lull in what was a rapidly escalating military anddiplomatic crisis.
Whether the fighting really ends, one result of the conflict isclear: it has thrown a bright light on that region's importanceto global oil supplies. A pipelinethat runs through Georgia is the second largest in the world.
But a little-reported fact is that American tax dollars were used tohelp fund big oil projects in the region.
Georgiasits between the rich oil deposits of the Caspian Sea in the East, andthe friendly shores of the Mediterranean in the West. Since 2006, a1,100 mile pipelinehas pumped that crude from Baku, in Azerbaijan, westwards across theconflict-torn continent to tanker ships waiting at the Turkish city ofCeyhan. The multi-billion-dollar Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline is run byan international consortium, including American oil-giants Chevron andConoco-Phillips.
The Daily Mail in the U.K. has reported that Russianplanes have targeted the pipeline, and Georgia's president, MikheilSaakashvili, told reporters at a conference call that the war is aRussian oil-grab to "controlenergy routes."
So, how is U.S. taxpayer money bound up in all of this?
It has to do with the role of the two government agencies, the Export-Import Bank(Ex-Im) and the Overseas Private Investment Corporation(OPIC), that lend money to private companies doing business overseas.
Theseagencies exist to promote U.S. business abroad, which they do by givingloans and guarantees for projects that are too big or, in many cases,too risky for the tastes of private banks and financiers.
"Weexist to take risks that the commercial markets either cannot or arenot willing to make," said Phil Cogan, spokesman at the Ex-Im Bank."That's the reason for export credit agencies for the most part. It'sto support the exporters of the United States because those exporterswouldn't be able to make the sale unless there was a guarantee ordirect lending."
In the case of this pipeline, the Ex-Im Bank gavea $160 million guarantee to a group of banks that wanted to lend moneyto the companies involved in the project. If the project fails or goesup in flames (which it could do, literally) Ex-Im will bail out theprivate banks, and taxpayers will be left holding the bag.
Samedeal for OPIC, which gave the project $100 million in "political riskinsurance." In other words, the companies apparently weighed the riskof just the sort of conflict the region is now facing, and then went toa government agency for insurance.
Critics see these guarantees as a form of corporate welfare.
"Ifwe're talking about the oil and gas industry, there's absolutely noneed for the federal government to be investing in any new projects,"said Keith Ashdown from Taxpayers for Common Sense, a non-profit thatworks to reduce wasteful government spending. "These guys are makingmoney hand over fist, and they can be investing in their own newcapital projects."
In the case of the BTC pipeline, activistsand academics have been warning about the project's dangers foryears, and arguing that taxpayers shouldn't incur the risk.
Ex-Imspokesman Cogan stresses that the government-funded bank usually bringsin a net profit from the fees it charges for insuring risky projects.He also said that this loan is far from the biggest that Ex-Im has made.
Noris the U.S the only country whose taxpayers helped make the dealhappen. The biggest player in the project is British Petroleum, whichowns just over 30 percent of the pipeline. The U.K.'s export creditagency, as well as the European development bank, also putmoney into the deal.
BPspokesman Robert Wine said despite the reports that the pipeline hasbeen targeted by Russian planes, the "pipeline hasn't been affected bythe conflict." He said that BP "continues to monitor the situation."
"Thepipeline is a channel that runs through Georgia," he said. "We don'thave business interests of any great note in Georgia, and clearly thisis a matter for the governments of Georgia and Russia."
Sharona Coutts recently graduated with honors from Columbia JournalismSchool's investigative seminar.
THE PIGS WEBSITE OF THEDAY...........
THEPIGS COMMODITY NEWS OF THE DAY.....
Senatorssay report on oil prices is flawedBy MARY CLARE JALONICK
WASHINGTON (AP) — Four Democratic senators on Thursday asked for aninvestigation into a government report on oil prices that the lawmakerssaid was based on flawed information.
In a letter to theinspector general of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, thesenators criticized an interim study released last month that saidfundamental supply-and-demand factors were to blame for the recentrun-up in oil prices. The senators said the study, which played downthe role of speculation, was based on inaccurate data.
They alsoquestioned the timing of its release.The report was issued a few daysbefore the Senate voted not to move forward on legislation that wouldhave required the commission to set limits on trading in oil markets byinvestors and speculators.
"The report, which specificallyaddressed speculation, appears to have been created and released toinfluence that Senate vote, which would be highly improper, in ourview," wrote Sens. Ron Wyden of Oregon, Byron Dorgan of North Dakota,Maria Cantwell of Washington and Bill Nelson of Florida.
Democratshave pushed the legislation designed to curb speculation, saying therapid increases in oil prices have coincided with big rises in tradingon oil future markets. Many Republicans have argued that high gasolineprices are caused by the basic economics of supply not meeting demand.
Inthe interim report released July 22, the Interagency Task Force onCommodity Markets said its preliminary analysis "does not support theproposition that speculative activity has systematically driven changesin oil prices." The task force, chaired by the CFTC, was formed in Juneto examine the sharp run-up in oil prices.
In Thursday's letter,the four senators said the report was not based on the best availabledata. They pointed to a July 18 announcement by the CFTC that they saidindicated some of the information used in the report was inaccurate.That announcement said speculative investors had played a larger rolein some oil trading than originally thought.
"We are greatlydisturbed that although CFTC staff obviously knew that underlying dataused to prepare the interim report was seriously flawed, the interimreport was nonetheless publicly released," the senators wrote, askingthe inspector general to look into how the report was prepared and "whyit was released after the CFTC staff had determined that criticalinformation upon which it was based was inaccurate."
Dennis Holden, a spokesman for the CFTC, said Thursday thecommission had no comment on the letter.
Uponreleasing the report, the task force said it planned to continueevaluating markets. It said it issued the interim report "in light ofthe recent increases in energy prices and the resulting concerns of thepublic and policy makers."
Dorgan said the CFTC was a "referee" to make sure the market works.
"The so-called referee here has been willfully blind," he said.