Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Alabama Graphite Corp. Com ABGPF



GREY:ABGPF - Post by User

Comment by DoctorFouadon Jan 04, 2015 2:10pm
126 Views
Post# 23283998

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Myths in the industry & ALP secret weapon to convince Tesla!

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Myths in the industry & ALP secret weapon to convince Tesla!thanks micromanager. I really hope the 5 anomalies they found on coosa could reveal at least a good resopurce a la Bama. it would be unfortunate after years of exploration to abandon a huge graphite deposit like Coosa.

My main worries for Coosa is that eventhough the deposit is so big (more than 30 million tonnes of ore of measured and indicated resources), the head grade is so low (3% average, with a very low cut off at 2%), and the mettalurgical results are relatively disappointing (only 92% concentrate purity). Moreso when you compare to some other canadian déposits, which exhibit 10%+ head grade, with 94-98% concentrate purity (Focus graphite, Mason graphite).

Thats why Bama discovery is important, it puts ALP directly with the top of canadian companies in terms of graphite quality deposits. 

I am doubtful that the new coosa anomalies could radically change the quality of the overall deposit, but who knows, i would love to be provern wrong, and if the area of the anomalies reveals a far higher head grade and better purity test results after drilling, they could just build their mine in this area, and use the remaining lower grade of the deposit in the future as an expansion plan.

all this brings us to two unknowns/questions :
1/ could they improve the coosa deposit quality ?
2/could they find a sufficiently large graphite deposit in Bama ?  
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>